Wednesday, June 11, 2014

The Most Holy Trinity




Trinity Sunday             A God of love

Reading I          Exodus 34:4-6, 8-9 (renewal of the tablets)
Reading II         2 Corinthians 13:11-13 (farewell)
Gospel                                John 3:16-18 (belief in the Son sent by the Father)

Key Passage    For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life. (John 3:16)

Adult:   We live within the Trinity whenever we live in love. How does this mystery connect to your daily life?
Child:    How do you choose to live as a more loving person

Pentecost Sunday


Image:"Pentecost Fire"
© Jan Richardson
 

June 7, 2014



In the Gospel for the feast of the Ascension, the Church is given the great commission of making disciples of all the nations.
It was Jesus' work. It now becomes the Church's work.
In the Gospel for Pentecost, the Church is given the power of forgiving sins and making people right before God.
It was the Lord's work.
It now becomes the Church's work.
In other words, forgiveness is our work

Indeed, the whole ministry of the Lord is turned over to the Church.
But, of course, the ministry remains the Lord's ministry, for he and the Church make up one and the same body.
Jesus once said, "I have come to set the earth on fire, and how I wish it were already blazing!" (Luke 12:49).
He began the task so well!
Now, we must continue it!
It was not interrupted by his death: it is further empowered by his death.
His return to glory only adds immeasurable strength and grace to the effort.
It is up to us to catch the new Spirit and to cast the fire.

I always tire of politicians who want us to elect them so that our children and grandchildren will have a better future.
I always suspect their motives.
I'm a firm believer in making our leaders take care of our generation, our time and its challenges, and that we should not allow them to deflect our minds to some vague future.
It lets them off the hook; they don=t have to be accountable.

I suspect that there are Church leaders who likewise "cast their anchor" into the future rather than taking care of the present.
They write off the present generation and look instead, like politicians, to the future.
They say things are bad now, what with the scarcity of vocations, the departures from the priesthood, the scandals, the affluence, the false values, the hedonism, the violence, the egotism, and the lack of a generous heart.

But the future will be different! They say.
So, we must look to the future, side‑stepping the present.
They are wrong.
They are appointed to be the shepherds of the present, and not of some vague future.
The future is someone else's responsibility.

We must take care of our own time and our own place in salvation history.
The great commission means we must
 Cand Pentecost means we can.
We tend to see Pentecost as a mighty rush of the Spirit energizing all things with wonder and light and multiple conversions.
And that, surely, is part of it.
But Pentecost is also the quiet breath of the Spirit, speaking calmly within us about our unmoored time,
keeping us strong in faith and anchored in the present as we wonder about the next step,
informing our minds with possible solutions and new pastoral approaches,
and assuring our hearts that personal holiness is the most effective catechesis of all
. No generationCthe present one includedCis able to withstand the witness of saints.
Does the present generation see holiness and sanctity in the present set of shepherds?
Or does it see shepherds looking to the future, side‑stepping the present?

Is that what we are called to in our own time and place?
Is that the challenge of this generation to usCto be saintsCto witness to them by our holiness?
If it is, and if we achieve it with God's grace, thenCand then onlyCmay we happily write off this generation for a spiritual poverty of its own making.
But, until we are well on the way to holiness, write off nothing
B and don't expect too much!

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Does the church need a reality check on same-sex marriage?


Sometimes, everyone can benefit from a good reality check. And this week, Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah has said that we might need a reality check about same-sex marriage in the United States.
Contrary to what the senator says on his website, where he firmly supports marriage as between one man and one woman, on Wednesday he spoke on a radio program about the inevitability that same-sex marriage will eventually become legal throughout the entire country.
As Religion News Service reports, Hatch was quoted as saying on KSL Radio’s “Doug Wright Show”: “Let’s face it, anybody who does not believe that gay marriage is going to be the law of the land just hasn’t been observing what’s going on. There is a question whether (the courts) should be able to tell the states what they can or cannot do with something as important as marriage, but the trend right now in the courts is to permit gay marriage and anybody who doesn’t admit that just isn’t living in the real world.”
While clarifying that he disagreed with decisions from judges in Utah, who had overturned the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, Hatch continued: “I think it’s a portent of the future that sooner or later gay marriage is probably going to be approved by the Supreme Court of the United States, certainly as the people in this country move towards it, especially young people. I don’t think that’s the right way to go; on the other hand, I do accept whatever the courts say.”
Is there a way for the Catholic Church to respond to this reality in a similar way? To basically say: We don’t think this is the right way to go, but we accept that the courts say this is legal and that this here to stay. Instead of reacting by declaring court decisions mistakes and travesties of justice—as was done after the recent decision in Pennsylvania that declared the state’s ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional—it seems more realistic for the church as an institution to adopt the attitude that Hatch is putting forth. It’s no secret that Catholics in the pew don’t see eye to eye with church teaching on the issue: A March 2014 Pew survey shows that close to 60 percent of Catholics support same-sex marriage.
As Bryan Cones proposed in a recent Sounding Board for U.S. Catholic, one first step could be for us to separate the church and state when it comes to marriages. He writes: “It is time that Catholic conversations about the issue recognize that we are talking about two different realities when we use the word ‘marriage’—a legal contract on the civil side, and a sacramental covenant between two baptized people on the other—and adjust our practice accordingly. Doing so would allow Catholics to have a fruitful intramural conversation about our theological understanding of the sacrament of marriage without being entangled in the question of whether families and couples who don’t fit that vision should have access to the legal benefits and duties that go with its civil parallel.”
The church could spend more time and resources figuring out how to deal with the reality that people (including Catholics) will continue to have legal same-sex marriages. Church teaching is clear that gay people have full human dignity, even though church teaching is just as clear that the sacrament of marriage is meant for one man and one woman. But wouldn’t it be better for the church to acknowledge what’s happening, namely that legally recognized same-sex marriage is a reality in many states and that it will likely one day be legal nationwide? By, say, figuring out ways to effectively minister to gay couples, or to welcome children of same-sex parents into Catholic school?
These are real issues that the church faces now and will continue to face in the future. Pretty soon, it could be time for a reality check from the church.

Ryan's Letter to the Poor



Paul Ryan says he has a cure for poverty, but the evidence says otherwise.
Pity poor Paul Ryan. Even as the Wisconsin congressman tries to reinvent himself as a conservative champion of the poor, he still finds a way to get into trouble with a speech about the pathologies of American inner-city life that sounded to critics a lot like coded references to race.
Even giving Ryan the benefit of the doubt, there is still plenty to question about his latest enthusiasm for tackling poverty in America. Ryan is following an oft-repeated prescriptive: Resolving the problem of modern poverty, and specifically breaking up cycles of generational poverty, requires diminishing—even dismantling—the social welfare system.
Ryan and like-thinkers believe the system is too generous. He argues that to truly help the nation’s underclass, its forlorn members must be ripped away from a system that is psychologically and spiritually undermining, crafting generations of dependency and dooming young people to lifetimes of poverty.
This sensibility offers the collateral benefit of requiring less from fellow citizens to “do good”: fewer programs to offer a leg up to the poor, tougher standards of eligibility for interventions like school lunches. It’s a win-win for everyone. It is better for the poor, who will be driven to their knees and begin pulling themselves up by their own bootstraps. It’s better for taxpayers, whose burdens will be lightened, and it is better for the national budget, which can then direct its tax-fueled energies—per Ryan’s recent proposals—to renewed defense spending.
But what if the problem with the nation’s approach to poverty reduction isn’t that it is spending too much on the poor, but too little? That it is not, in fact, dependency that produces cycles of generational poverty, but the lack of adequate early interventions? What if the way to get people out of poverty is to ensure that they have the healthy bodies and fortified minds that would allow them to compete and excel in the future?
Real-world experiments have already provided some answers. More than 40 years ago, researchers in North Carolina started following two groups of babies from poor families. Children in the first group were given full-time day care up to age 5 where the children were not only fed, but also given a chance to build social skills through interactions, games, and other stimulating activities. The other group was given nothing more than baby formula.
Scientists were interested in learning if the first group would show better cognitive development and educational outcomes over the long run. The participants’ cognitive performance diverged as early as age 3. By age 30, those in the enhanced-care group were four times as likely to have graduated from college. But to their surprise, researchers discovered an unexpected benefit: The better-supported group also turned out far healthier, with sharply lower rates of high blood pressure and obesity, than the children who got nothing.
The North Carolina study joins a growing body of evidence showing that investment in early childhood has lifelong implications. Here is a true virtuous circle: Better fed and educated children become adults who are more capable of poverty-breaking employment and without the personal health issues that would contribute to what is fast becoming the nation’s largest social burden—health care.
Like Rep. Ryan, the church has also worried about the soul-crushing potential of a suffocating social welfare bureaucracy. But in Catholic social teaching, our encyclicals’ authors probably had more the Soviet model of social suppression in mind than cheerful Swedish day care centers for working parents or programs that deliver daily bread to struggling families.
The church supports the appropriate role of the state in providing minimum effective standards of social supports for the least among us. It is not in the business of providing religious cover for government to do its least among them.
This article appeared in the June 2014 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 79, No. 6, page 38).

How Does Your Garden Grow?


Although stewardship may not be a familiar term to most Catholics, it is the core of the Christian way of life. Bishop Robert Morneau plots out a plan for tending to all that has been entrusted to us.
Some years ago I came across a poem by the Spaniard Antonio Machado (1875-1939), and after memorizing it I had many a sleepless night. The verse involves a dialogue between the wind (could it be the Holy Spirit?) and the individual soul. Here is the poem as translated by Robert Bly:
The wind, one brilliant day, called to my soul with an aroma of jasmine.
“In return for this jasmine odor, I’d like all the odor of your roses.”
“I have no roses; I have no flowers left now in my garden…. All are dead.”
“Then I’ll take the waters of the fountains, and the yellow leaves and the dried-up petals.”
The wind left…. I wept. I said to my soul, “What have you done with the garden entrusted to you?”
The poem ends with the stewardship question: What have we done with the garden entrusted to us? What have we done with the garden of our bodies and souls, of our family and friends, of our political and cultural heritage, of nature and the globe, of everything? Stewardship is inclusive, demanding, and exhilarating.
In 1992 the National Conference of Catholic Bishops issued the pastoral letter Stewardship: A Disciple’s Response. Although the committee that wrote the document began its work with the problem of a shortage of financial support of the church and her mission, the final document went far beyond financial concerns. As articulated in the letter, stewardship is a way of life beginning in conversion of heart. If we are truly followers of Jesus (disciples), then we express that relationship by being good stewards of our time, talent, and treasure. To turn this around: Can I claim to be a good Christian if I fail in justly and generously sharing all the gifts God has given to me? And implicit within the theology and practice of stewardship is the importance of doing justice in our times.
Yet, even given this broad perspective, there is a danger that stewardship might be limited to the church’s inner life: maintaining its own programs, buildings, ministries. Properly understood, the theology presented in the pastoral letter is highly inclusive and has a direct relationship to the issues of social justice. That relationship needs to be explicit. But what is stewardship? What is social justice all about? How are they connected? Is there a good “case study” that demonstrates that connection?
Creation held in trust
Stewardship is about four things: 1) receiving God’s gifts gratefully, 2) nurturing and tending those gifts responsibly, 3) sharing those gifts justly and charitably, and 4) returning those gifts to God in abundance. As good stewards we recognize that God is the source of every gift, of all holiness. Further, we are to exercise great discipline in developing the talents given us. What God has given is to be shared—because we are not owners but trustees. We measure the quantity of stewardship in terms of our just and charitable dispositions of all that has been given us. Finally, as death comes to us, we must render an account of all that has been entrusted to us: our time, be it short or long; our talents, be they many or few; our treasure, be it minimal or bountiful.
Second, stewardship is inclusive and demanding. It involves every dimension of our life. One of the best ways to formulate the stewardship question is in terms of an analogy: What have we done and what are we doing with the garden entrusted to us? Most accurately, with the gardens given us to tend?
Here are some possibilities: Our physical garden: How well do we manage our health by proper exercise and nutrition, by watching our weight, by taking or allowing time for leisure? Our psychological garden: Do we respect our emotional life and seek help in times of illness? Our social garden: Do we care sufficiently for those around us in our immediate families and friendships as well as exercise concern for these issues of our broader society? Our political garden: Are we knowledgeable citizens and do we assume appropriate responsibility for the common good? Our economic garden: How do we accumulate and disperse our financial resources with justice and charity? Our ecological garden: How well do we attend to the needs of our planet by proper use of our water, air, and soil? Our cultural garden: Do we support the arts and those who attempt to bring beauty into our lives? Our technological garden: How well do we use the great gift of technology—computers, mass media—in making the world a healthier and safer place? Our spiritual garden: What care do we give to our relationship with God in worship, personal prayer, and our unique call to ministry?
There is no area of life that is not part of stewardship. All is gift; all is grace. God is the origin of life, of freedom, of everything that we are and have. Because stewardship is so inclusive, it is extremely demanding. No surprise that many refuse to embrace their identity as stewards to avoid the awesome responsibility that such a designation holds. If I am an absolute owner—and not a steward—I need answer only to myself.
As a way of life, stewardship is also an expression of discipleship. In following Christ, every disciple is in a constant process of conversion, a turning away from the false self to the living and true God. Conversion involves a change of attitude and behavior. But there is something deeper here, a change of image and therefore a change in our very identity. The disciple appropriates the image of being a steward, a caretaker of God’s world in all of its aspects. Once the image is changed, this affects our attitudes and our lifestyle. Stewardship makes a difference. Stewardship shapes destinies.
How justice prevails
Justice has to do with promoting and protecting rights as well as acknowledging and living out our basic responsibilities. Individual justice deals primarily with the moral claims of individuals, whereas social justice is concerned about the rights and duties that exist within families, communities, and nations. The human person is a social being. It is within social structures that we receive our education, health care, and employment. When social justice is denied, the dignity of the human person is deeply injured.
Within the Catholic tradition we have a rich philosophy of social justice. In recent years the church has summarized the principles that describe the building blocks of social justice:
·         Every human person has an intrinsic dignity that must be honored.
·         As social beings we need one another and have a right to belong.
·         Everyone has a right to work, to employment.
·         Workers have rights and corresponding duties.
·         Those who are poor and vulnerable should be given preferential treatment.
·         We are all one family, and thus the principle of solidarity should undergird all our transactions.
The major issues in our society, often hotly debated, involve social justice: wars, abortion, assisted suicide, unemployment, housing, health care, education, family life, and prison reform, among others. In every one of these issues the question of rights and duties often arises in circumstances that are extremely complex. One need only review the decisions of the United States Supreme Court to realize that easy black-and-white resolutions are hard to come by. Doing justice is difficult work demanding intelligence, integrity, and much wisdom.
Every day all of us are involved in justice issues: raising our children, responsible voting, fulfilling our duties as employees (if an employer, making sure that employees’ rights are protected), driving safely, contributing to those in need, caring for the earth. Justice is not reserved to the courtroom. Whenever people interact—at home, at school, in the office—justice issues are involved.
Cultivate a new language
Stewardship is returning a proportion of our time, talent, and treasure to the Lord, from whom all things come. As stewards of our political and economic gardens, we must necessarily be concerned about issues of social justice. We are to have care and concern for the common good. This will be a challenge in an age of ingrained individualism. As Robert Bellah and his associates demonstrated back in 1984 in their Habits of the Heart, our primary language today is that of the “I.” Unfortunately our secondary language, still known but not used existentially, is that of the common good, duty, rights, justice. Language helps to shape reality just as reality tends to mold our language.
Stewards must be bilingual in a sense: speaking of the self as well as of the community. The development not only of a vocabulary but a way of life involves conversion, a turning away from selfishness to a life that includes others, developing a sense of solidarity. Dorothy Day (1897-1980), a woman who exercised through Catholic Worker stewardship in the land of justice, held that conversion is both a falling in love with God and a freedom that enables us to reach out to those who are in need.
Conversion, a radical change of heart, is a gift and a task. The gift dimension is the working of grace, God’s free bestowal of love and light into our souls. The task dimension is our effort to uproot values and prejudices that blind us to the needs of the poor. Our culture stresses the values of domination, competition, control. Too easily we buy into “the system” and thereby fail in our civic responsibilities. Unfortunately it sometimes takes personal or national tragedies to shock us awake to what really matters in life.
There are many individuals who have linked stewardship with social justice. Oscar Romero (1917-1980), the archbishop of San Salvador, challenged the unjust system of his land knowing that as a steward he had to care for his people in every dimension of their lives. He paid the price with his life. The layman Blessed Frederic Ozanam (1813-1853), who was gifted with a rich academic career and could have easily justified staying in that arena, gathered about him other individuals to form the St. Vincent de Paul Society to serve the poor in France. Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965) spent 53 years of his life in central Africa using his medical talent in serving 100,000 people. All stewards, all doing the work of justice.
Our corporate responsibility
Stewardship is to be exercised not only by individuals but also by corporate persons—by they the nation, the state, the local community, or various entities within these structures. As we talk about stewardship being linked with social justice, an organization comes to mind that does this linkage in an exemplary way: the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD). This organization was created by the U.S. bishops in 1970 for the following purposes: “to raise funds to assist self-help programs designed and run by the poor, to educate the more affluent about the root causes of poverty, and to change attitudes about the plight of the poor.”
CCHD has exercised remarkable stewardship in doing the work of justice. And, of course, the organization does this work in the name of the larger church that provides the financial support. A unique feature of the campaign—and a key to its success—is that it supports the changing of unjust social structures. It is one thing to help individuals by addressing their immediate needs (housing, medical care, employment); it is another to help change the system that keeps people homeless, helpless, and unemployed.
Another key dimension of the work of CCHD is to change attitudes. Often people have a stereotyping image of those who are poor and hurting. Until we truly understand the situation of an individual or group of people, we will lack the compassion to be of real assistance. Through a sustained program of education, CCHD has helped thousands of people change their attitudes by giving them facts and figures regarding those in our communities who are living in poverty. More than anything, the concept of the dignity of every human person has been the foundational idea to bring about a change of attitude and, hopefully, a change of behavior.
Precisely because of the unique and far-reaching task that it was given by the bishops of the United States, the CCHD has not been without its critics—some say its emphases on poverty groups and institutional change are too liberal, for example. In a report to the committee of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops in February 1979, the acting chairman of the CCHD’s Ad Hoc Committee, Bishop Francis Mugavero, stated: “The debate over CCHD’s criteria and guidelines is really a debate over CCHD itself. Without the focus on poverty, the self-determination requirement, and the emphasis on institutional change, CCHD would be an entirely different entity. … CCHD in its current form enjoys broad support in the Catholic community, has an excellent record of stewardship and performance, and is a unique American witness against poverty and injustice. On the key issues of poverty orientation, self-determination, and institutional change, CCHD is fully consistent with the biblical values and is a concrete reflection of Catholic social teaching. If CCHD were to abandon these commitments, what would take its place? And what kind of witness would this give to the nation and the world today?”
The stewardship exercised by CCHD involves three extremely important themes. One is participation. The basic principle—“growth demands participation”—is a proven adage. Everyone has the right to participate in those matters that shape and mold their destinies. Yet so many individuals are cut off from participation because of structures or prejudices that block their involvement. CCHD works diligently in helping the poor participate in shaping their own lives.
A second theme is that of empowerment. Again so many people are powerless due to circumstances that are historical, political, and cultural. CCHD aims at giving people an appropriate control of their lives, and with that control comes a sense of dignity and worth. In a world where too many people live in oppression and exploitation, an organization that empowers people is a sign of gospel presence.
Education is a third theme in the work of CCHD. The church’s teaching mission is crucial in helping to create what Pope John Paul II calls a “civilization of love.” Truth is foundational to a healthy society. Illusions lead to disease. We must constantly be given the truth: the truth of God’s redeeming love, the truth of the dignity of every person, the truth that our freedom creates serious responsibility, the truth that justice is necessary for peace.
There are many other corporate structures that also witness to the ministry of stewardship and the work of social justice. Catholic Relief Services, Catholic Charities USA, the Red Cross, and the Salvation Army are but a few that come to mind. These organizations receive, nurture, and share God’s gifts in the cause of promoting and protecting the rights of people.
In a confirmation letter to me from a high-school junior, the candidate wrote: “God is the reason I’m alive today. I am deeply indebted to God for all that has been given me. By using my gifts I am saying to God that ‘I love you’ and ‘I want to honor you by being the best person I can be.’ I want everyone to know who God is.”
That’s evangelization—helping people to know who God is. That is the essential mission of the church. One of the best ways of helping people to know God is by living as good stewards and doing the work of social justice. For when the sick are tended, the poor are helped, the alien is welcomed, the hungry are fed, the homeless are given shelter—then people will again come to know who God is and that God is truly present among the people.

- See more at: http://www.uscatholic.org/articles/201405/15-years-ago-us-catholic-how-does-our-garden-grow-28939?utm_source=June+3%2C+2014&utm_campaign=ebulletin+June+3%2C+2014&utm_medium=email#sthash.PMSK5jBP.dpuf

Stewardship Homily: Francis de Sales


Stewardship
by Greg Mort
June 1, 2014


I’ve been watching The hockey playoffs.
Having grown up mostly in Chicago, I’m a Blackhawks fan.
Seems to me that there are two kinds of people who love hockey.

The first if the person like me; the person who turns on the TV, grabs some potato chips, and watches; the person who cheers with his team and yells at the referees.
The second kind of person who loves hockey is the champion; the person who spends years playing the game.
Both love hockey.  One is an armchair fan.  The other is a champion.

Now...it seems to me that there are also two kinds of people who love the Church.
The first person belongs to St. Therese and comes to Mass every Easter and Christmas. 
He drops $2 in the collection basket when it goes by. 
He brings his children to be baptized, and he brings his parents for a Catholic funeral.

The second person who loves Church never misses Sunday. 
This person tithes - she gives a big chunk of her income and makes real sacrifices to support the Church. 
This person takes Communion to a nursing home or serves on Justice & Peace committee.
This person steps forward when a volunteer is needed for some special cause.

Both love the Catholic Church. 
If we want to use the sports terminology, we might call one an armchair Catholic and the other - a champion of the Faith.

Before we go any farther, I want to be clear that I don't mean any disrespect to the person I'm calling an "armchair Catholic." 
We thank God for the person who comes every Christmas, for the person who finds it in his heart to donate $2 a year, for the person who makes sure his babies are baptized.
 We thank the Lord for that Faith.

But for me...and I think for everyone here today...that isn't enough. 
Our  Faith is far too important for us to be an armchair fan. 
I need God at the center of my life. 
I need the peace that the Church gives me. 
I need the strength and the courage that the Church offers me. 
I need the friends and the support that I find in the Church. 
And I need to hear the promise of the kingdom waiting for me after death.
St. Paul tells us that God gives us different talent
And that they are to be shared among the whole body.
 
I don’t know about you, but I can't live as an armchair Catholic. 
I need far more security than that in life.

That is just what the concept of Stewardship is all about. 
The more we need of the Church, the more we need to give.

The good steward is the person who offers serious time to God and the Church; time for Mass; time in the chapel; time for prayer. 
She gives time to help the needy and time whenever the parish needs it. 
she gives time even when it is in short supply.

The good steward is the person who offers to share whatever talents he might have. 
If he can sing, he joins the choir. 
If he is good with children, he might help in the Parish nursery or help teach our children about their faith. 
If he has a lot of ideas, he might help with one of our Parish committees.


The good steward is the person who shares her treasure. 
She understands that it takes a lot of money for the Church to function. 
She gives a chunk of her salary and makes honest sacrifices to be sure that the Church is able to carry on. 
She gives up some of the extras in life to be sure that  can carry out its ministries.

Most of us probably sit in front of the TV with our ice cream or potato chips and secretly dream of standing on a podium, receiving a gold medal while the National Anthem is played and the world praises us. 
I have dreams of being an Olympic champion. 
But honestly, I can live without that. 
I'm too old, and I'm not ready to invest what it takes to be an Olympic champion.
An armchair hockey fan is fine for me.

But, I am not satisfied to be an armchair Catholic.
My faith is just too important. 
I have a dream which I won't give up: one day standing before the Lord and hearing the words I most long to hear, "Well done.  You have been a good and faithful steward. 
Look at all you've done for me, and for my Church."
That is worth more than a gold medal. 
That is the gold crown that I'm looking for.
And I hope you are too.

For some particulars on how you can help, I’ve invited the Chairperson of our Finance Council to speak to you for a couple of minutes.
Please welcome Jim Pavik.



The Ascension of the Lord


Image: "Ascension"
© Jan Richardson


June 1, 2014

It helps, now and then, to step back and take a long view.

Journeying to the metaphoric Matthean mountain in Galilee where he began his ministry teaching, Jesus now comes to his friends for a final bon voyage.
Having completed his work upon earth, Jesus imparts his compelling words “go, make disciples of all nations.”
It is a graduation of sorts for the apostles, indicating that the earthly mission of Jesus is complete, and the responsibility for its continuation now rests with his followers.
But it holds the consolation that Jesus will be with them in the power of the Holy Spirit until the end of the age.
It is usually during Advent of the liturgical year when the church enters into the season of waiting.
But it is in this weekend celebrating the Ascension of the Lord—wherein we hang between two worlds with Christ who is leaving the earth in body, and yet coming in a new way in Spirit—we are called to enter a dynamic waiting for the coming of the Holy Spirit!
We must, like a gardener waiting for the earth to bloom, stand open and ready to receive what comes from above.
God’s purposes are to be revealed through the Spirit, and Jesus asks us to heed the waiting time for that revelation.

It is a paradigm shift that the ascending Jesus suggests.
The Hebrew Scriptures limited the Spirit’s actions to certain great prophets, judges or kings who had the privilege and responsibility to speak the words of Yahweh.
Now the Holy Spirit will be sent to all people who are baptized into the Trinitarian relationship with Father, Son and Spirit.
All believers will be invited to proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ to every nation.
Confessing our faith will be part of our very identity.

I remember as a teenager praying the “prayers at the foot of the altar” after Mass.
The priest prayed to St. Michael the Archangel, to Mary the Holy Queen, for the intentions of the Pope…
Then one day, a new prayer was added, both surprising us and filling us with anticipation.
We were asked to pray for the success of an ecumenical council scheduled on the horizons of the new year.
Every church throughout the world was asked to pray for the coming of the Holy Spirit.

Pope John XXIII referred to the prayer in his convocation to the Vatican Council on Christmas Day, 1961, begging the “Divine Spirit to answer in a most comforting manner the prayer that rises daily to Him from every corner of the earth:”
“Renew your wonders in our time, as though for a new Pentecost, And grant that the Holy Church, preserving unanimous and continuous prayer, together with Mary, the mother of Jesus, and also under the guidance of St. Peter, may increase the reign of the Divine Savior, the reign of truth and justice, the reign of love and peace”[1]
The prayer had a way of engaging Catholics with anticipation of what might happen if the world was again infused by the Holy Spirit.
We all stood once more with Peter and the apostles, listening in a new way to the Lucan invitation to “wait for the promise of the Father about which you have heard me speak…for in a few days you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit” (Acts 1:8).
That power which would come though the Holy Spirit will create some tremendous opportunities to be “my witnesses in Jerusalem…and to the ends of the earth.”
We go into this dark night of opportunity not alone, but with Christ, as his witnesses.
The Vatican Council changed the face and the heart of the Church.
The Spirit of Pentecost came once again in our history!

Rather than a bon voyage, the ascension of the Lord solicits a new call to bid us actively await the coming of the Spirit so that the reign of God might be proclaimed afresh to all peoples.

It helps, now and then, to step back and take a long view.
The kingdom is not only beyond our efforts, it is even beyond our vision.
We accomplish in our lifetime only a tiny fraction of the magnificent enterprise that is God’s work…
We plant the seeds that one day will grow….
We may never see the end results, but that is the difference between the master builder and the worker.
We are workers, not master builders;
ministers, not messiahs.
We are prophets of a future not our own.
           




[1] (The Documents of Vatican II, Walter M. Abbott, S.J., General Editor, 1966, p. 709).



Fifth Sunday of Easter A



May 25, 2014

ANo one comes to the Father except through me."
Many Christians in today=s world have turned these words into a weapon with which to bludgeon one=s opponents into theological submission.
They use these words as a litmus test for Christian faith in myriad conversations and debates within the contemporary church.
They have become the rallying cry of Christian triumphalism, proof positive that Christians have the corner on God and that people of any and all other faiths are condemned.
They are seen by others as embarrassingly exclusionary and narrow‑minded, and they are pointed to as evidence of the problems inherent in asserting Christian faith claims in a pluralistic world

How are we contemporary Christian supposed to interpret this central claim of the Fourth Gospel?
It is important that before we accept or reject the John=s affirmation, embrace or distance oneself from its theological view, that we allow him to have his say.
In other words, we have to engage ourselves in an act of theological imagination when interpreting this passage,
we need to try to envision what he was trying to say to his contemporaries, and not interpret his words through our own times.
Jesus= claim that Ano one comes to the Father except through me@ is the joyous affirmation of a religious community that does, indeed, believe that God is available to them decisively in the incarnation.
That his Spirit is living in them, alive and well.

This claim has been announced from the opening lines of the Gospel, ANo one has ever seen God.
It is God the only Son, who is close to the Father=s heart, who has made him known@
It is only through the incarnation that the identity of God as Father is revealed.
When Jesus says: AI am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me,@  John is not making a statement about AGod@.
Jesus does not say ANo one comes to God except through me,@ but ANo one comes to the Father except through me,@ and the specificity of that theological use of words needs to be taken seriously.


John 14:6 is the very concrete and specific affirmation of a faith community about the God who is known to them only through the incarnation.
the incarnation changes everything for the Fourth Evangelist, because through it humanity=s relationship to God and God=s relationship to humanity are decisively altered.
The incarnation has redefined God for the Fourth Evangelist and those for whom he writes, because the incarnation brings the tangible presence of God=s love to the world.
AGod@ is not a generic deity here;
God is the One whom the disciples come to recognize in the life and death of Jesus.
When Jesus says Ano one,@ he means Anone of you.@
 In John 14:6, then, Jesus defines God for his disciples; the Fourth Evangelist defines God for the members of his faith community.

It is important to try to hear this joyous, world‑changing theological affirmation in the first‑century context of the Fourth Gospel.
This is not, as is the case in the twentieth century, the sweeping claim of a major world religion, but it is the conviction of a religious minority in the ancient Mediterranean world.
 It is the conviction of a religious group who had discovered that its understanding of the truth of God carries with it a great price.
This conviction has led them into conflict with the Judaism that previously had been their sole religious home, and so they have had to carve out a new religious home for themselves, a home grounded in the incarnation.
It is possible to hear an element of defiance in the proclamation of 14:1‑11, a determination to hold to this experience and knowledge of God against all opposition and all pressure to believe otherwise.
In the unambiguous words of John 14:6‑7, the Fourth Gospel declares where it stands in the first‑century intra‑Jewish debate about the character of God and the identity of God=s people.
It=s a call for us twentieth-century Catholic Christians to re-assess our own faith.
Are we first of all Catholic?
Or are we first of all Christian
In other words, are we more grounded in our religion or in our faith in the Spirit of our incarnate Savior?
This is something important for us to ponder, for it has far-reaching implications for our faith decisions.

Getting back to the today=s scripture, The Fourth Gospel is not concerned with the fate, for example, of Muslims, Hindus, or Buddhists, nor with the superiority or inferiority of Judaism and Christianity as they are configured in the modern world.
It=s not even concerned, definitely not concerned, with even whether or not we are Catholic.
These verses are merely the confessional celebration of a particular faith community, convinced of the truth and life it has received in the incarnation.
The Fourth Evangelist=s primary concern was the clarification and celebration of what it means to believe in Jesus.
The theological vision articulated here expresses the distinctiveness of Christian identity,
and it is as people shaped by this distinctiveness that Christians can take their place in conversations about world religion.
Indeed, the Prologue=s claims about the Logos, the Word of God provide an opening for conversations about how one encounters the divine,
not the closing of discussion.

John 14:6 can thus be read as the core claim of Christian identity; what distinguishes Christians from peoples of other faiths is the conviction given expression in John 14:6.
It is, indeed, through Jesus, and only through Jesus,  that Christians have access to their God.