Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Sinfully Honest



U.S. Catholic readers confess that sin isn’t what it used to be, but they still commit themselves to a virtuous lifestyle.

In his letter to the Romans, St. Paul reminds us that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” That Paul always was a bit of a downer. For a long time, the people in the pews had a fairly solid understanding of sin and what it meant to “fall short.” But good ol’ Paul lived a long time ago, and the times, they are a-changin’. These days, the first association that many people have with the seven deadly sins is Brad Pitt in the movie Seven. Sin, it seems, may have fallen out of favor, at least among the more than 300 people who took our U.S. Catholic reader survey.

“It’s time to update our theology of sin,” says Kathleen Gibbons Schuck from Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. She says that, in lieu of a language of condemnation, we should be using language that people can resonate with, such as “separation and breaking down of relationship.” Paul Schlachter of Miami, Florida agrees. To him, the seven deadly sins are “arbitrary and reflective of the mores of the times,” he says. “They focus excessively on individual cause and effect, leaving untouched the social consequences that pass unperceived.”

Many U.S. Catholic readers seem to agree with that sentiment—or at least agree that many Catholics think that way. Seventy-two percent of survey participants think that Catholics do not take sin as seriously as they used to. They offer myriad explanations for this. Madeline Gough of Laguna Woods, California believes that this is thanks to poor catechesis. “[Young people] are not being taught by parents and educators such as priests and schools about their faith,” she says.

Some people think that it is not poor catechesis, but rather the church’s lack of credibility that is contributing to a lackadaisical attitude. William Bagley of Madison, Connecticut thinks that many church leaders have become “pharisees” who are “more concerned with rules than with the care of people who struggle with their lives.” Cynthia (who requested that her last name not be used) from Erlanger, Kentucky has some personal experience with that kind of priest. “I went to confession in Mississippi one time,” she says, “and the priest was yelling at me because I couldn’t remember the last time I had gone to confession. I should have walked out of the confessional!”

Other people think that the concept of sin as a particular set of rules just doesn’t make sense anymore, knowing what we now know about psychology and mental health. Patt McCabe of Wicklow, Ireland points out, “Some sins are mental health issues, such as substance abuse or gambling.” Margaret Glose from Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin claims that we are more self-aware than we used to be, reducing the need for prescribed sins. She writes, “We are just developing our own awareness of what to feel guilty about instead of feeling guilty because someone else has told us we should.”

Of course, some of the participants in the survey had yet another take on why it is that Catholics are not darkening the doors of confessionals all that frequently: They still take sin seriously, but they also recognize that not every sin requires a visit to your local confessor. Margot VanEtten of Rochester, New York explains, “I remember a priest describing what it was like to hear weekly confessions back in the day when you had to do that if you wanted to go to communion. He said, ‘It was like being stoned to death with popcorn.’ People were confessing to things that weren’t really sins, or trying to dredge up something to confess so they could receive communion.”

Not everyone is down on sin, however. Seventy-four percent of those responding to the survey report that they think the seven deadly sins remain a helpful guide for how to live our lives and how to treat others. Many people think that talking about sin does retain value, mostly because it gives us a way to examine our consciences. Jennifer Warden of Salem, Oregon says, “I think we tend to minimize sin. I think people today are very susceptible to the spirit of the age. We’re very relativistic and permissive. We don’t want to examine ourselves or judge others.”

Geraldine O’Mahoney of Stuart, Florida thinks that regardless of why people are not going to confession, they still need to. “Human nature does not change,” she says. “And God’s moral law certainly doesn’t change—therefore neither does the objective sinfulness of certain actions, nor our need for sacramental confession.”

Although about 30 percent of survey respondents claim that they can’t remember the last time they went to confession, many still think there is a need for the sacrament. Mitch Finley of Spokane, Washington agrees that going to confession is important, but he would like to see the church get a little more creative in how they handle it. “The fact is that there is a need for several options for celebrating the sacrament of reconciliation, one of which would be confession in private to a priest,” he says. “We need a communal reconciliation ritual, and if we had one, I think that it would be well attended.”

Dennis Winkelsas of Norfolk, Virginia agrees. “The church should go back to general or communal penance services,” he says. “I firmly believe that these services promoted a greater sense of sin, and a greater resolve of turning away from sin.”

If people are conflicted about the significance of sin in general, they are equally conflicted about what specifically counts as sin. In Greeley, Colorado, Elaine Hicks says that the sin she takes most seriously is “wrath, because it oftentimes is the result of feeling greed, envy, pride, and lust toward another.” Mary Branson of Mokpo, South Korea says that for her, “being judgmental” is her most serious sin.

One thing that most people seem to agree on, however, is that some aspects of the world have shifted rather significantly, and that affects the way that we relate to sin. Ariel Downing of Sheridan, Wyoming says, “We are so well connected—it is easier to hurt other people by our actions. The Internet, social media, and e-mail make it easier to hurt someone because there is no face-to-face contact.”

Silvio Darco of Tucson, Arizona notes that our modern sin landscape includes not just social media, but also “failing to understand the relationship between God and creation.” Robert Irwin of Berkeley, California agrees, stating that “our sinfulness is leading us to a triple catastrophe: environmental, political, and economic.”

Similarly, Richard Placone of Palo Alto, California recognizes that in our modern world, sin manifests itself in a uniquely global fashion. If he could make one addition to the classic seven deadly sins, he writes, it would be “global marginalization of the poor through unfair economics and perpetual warfare.”

Likewise, Robert Sammon of Tarrytown, New York writes that the most serious sins facing the faithful these days are all sins that we might not have even recognized as sins 50 or 100 years ago: “capital punishment, human trafficking, and economic injustice.”

With all of the negatives floating around, you might think that people are all caught up in the bad, even if they don’t want to call it sin. But the folks responding to the survey came back again and again to the virtues that help us to counteract sin. Helene K. Langan of Schoharie, New York writes, “I think that at this time the virtue of justice should be promoted because there is such a huge need for it in the world. There are too many who are hungry, poor, and jobless. The inequality between the rich and the poor is too great.”

Catherine Sims of Mundelein, Illinois thinks that the greatest virtue that we can rely on is humility: “Having a true sense of who we are before God and in relationship to the community of humanity. We forget so easily that we are creatures of God; not like God.”

Of course for all of the attention we pay to the seven deadly sins, they cannot hold a candle to the three great virtues. Michael Nagle of Edgartown, Massachusetts says that the path away from sin and toward virtue is paved with faith. “Live in the presence of God,” he says. “If you fall, rely on the mercy of God to pick you up and heal you.”

Sally Marshall of Lake Havasu, Arizona highlights the virtue of hope, saying, “I became a Catholic for the hope it offered me and a way to still live and go on.” And then there is John Chuchman of Central Lake, Michigan, who writes of the “greatest of these”: “God is love. When I live in love, I live in God and God in me.”

Valerie DaSilva of Kingston, New York sums it up as many have before her: “Love God and love neighbor.” The rest will work itself out.

And the survey says...

1. I’ve heard a homily about the seven deadly sins in the past year.

12% - Agree
80% - Disagree
8% - Other


2. Of the seven new deadly sins that the Vatican proposed in 2008, the ones that I think should become “official” deadly sins include:

15% - Using birth control and other “bioethical violations.”
19% - Stem cell research and similar “morally dubious” experiments.
28% - Drug abuse.
53% - Polluting the environment.
58% - Contributing to the divide between the rich and the poor.
26% - Being excessively wealthy.
70% - Creating poverty.

3. I will abstain from receiving communion if I know I have committed a serious sin and haven’t yet been to confession.

40% - Agree
48% - Disagree
12% - Other

Representative of “other”:
“Receiving communion makes you spiritually stronger and more aware to obtain forgiveness through confession. God is there for sinners and knows we are weak.”

4. I go to confession:

34% - Yearly.
16% - Monthly.
2% - Weekly.
18% - Only if I have committed a serious sin.
30% - I can’t remember the last time I went to confession.

5. The seven deadly sins are still a helpful guide on how to live our lives and how to treat others.

74% - Agree
16% - Disagree
10% - Other

6. The seven deadly sins are outdated and in need of a rewrite by the church.

29% - Agree
55% - Disagree
16% - Other

Representative of “other”:
“Maybe not a rewrite, but they should certainly be addressed from the pulpit in light of modern technology.”

7. Catholics don’t really take the idea of sin as seriously as they used to.

72% - Agree
16% - Disagree
12% - Other

Representative of “other”:
“Our language about sin has changed—as it should—but we need to go further, into talking, listening, and explaining.”

IF YOU HAVE THOUGHTS ON THIS, PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT.

Fr. Robert

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Sunday 14 A


In the Torah, under which Jesus lived, there were many laws and rules, and these were supplemented by centuries of interpretations of the Torah that regulated virtually every possible detail of human behavior.
While the Law is meant to bring Jews into right relationship with God and with others, any set of rules can become oppressive.
Part of the responsibility of the religious authorities is to see that religious and spiritual laws are obeyed. Jesus wanted to lift some of these legal burdens.

Many of you would probably tell me that the heaviest burden of your lives in the old days was your religion.
People used to agonize about going to hell if they went to communion after having had a speck of water touch their tongues after midnight.
How many people agonized over the sin committed by missing Mass even if they were sick or had to care for a sick parent or child?
I still have people confessing just that.

To be honest about it all, there are still a lot of the Pharisee in our own religion.
New rules about this or that keep being issued.
And it drives be crazy.
As one bishop said to a large gathering of priests B in another diocese, not ours: "These new rules have more to do with authority exerting itself than anything remotely associated with God."

All of you can come up with your own examples.
But it is true B the rules of religion can turn us into legalistic neurotics instead of freed children of God.
One of my greatest joys as a homilist is to help you understand that a loving God understands the heavy burdens you bear in life:
raising children, worrying about drugs in schools, taking care of elderly parents, single parents working at two jobs to support their children,
fear of a job loss, crime in the neighborhoods, guns everywhere, the high cost of education and medical care, to name a few.
Most of you end up in these pews having spent an exhausting week out in the world.
The last thing you want to hear from the pulpit is a road map for a guilt trip!
And you=re not getting it from me today.
Jesus tries to sweep away the rubble of such thinking.
"Come to me all you who are weary and heavy burdened and I will give you rest."

True religion empowers us to live a life of joy through contemplation, a sense of awe, a feeling of God's presence, all translated into good works for others.
As someone said "resting in God can give us the inner strength to live life to the full, with all its joys and struggles."
If we want to be confident we=re straight with God, all we need to do is examine our relationships with the people around us B
our families, the people we work with, the poor, the neglected, the forsaken in our world.
Are we doing all we can to help them?
If we are, we=re all right with God.
If we aren’t, we=ve got a problem that=s worth worrying about.
And maybe something to bring to confession that=s worth talking about.

So I=m not being facetious when I say ALoosen up.@
When we accept the invitation "to come to me, you who are burdenedY."
we catch a glimpse of God and a revelation of Who and what God is like.
When we ignore God=s invitation, all we have to look forward to is a life of heavy burdens and bags under our eyes.


19 Ways to Support Your Priest



Thursday, July 3, 2014

Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul






In a Peanuts cartoon Lucy demanded that Linus change TV channels, threatening him with her fist if he didn’t.
“What makes you think you can walk right in here and take over?” asks Linus. 
“These five fingers,” says Lucy. “Individually they’re nothing but when I curl them together like this into a single unit, they form a weapon that is terrible to behold.”
“Which channel do you want?” asks Linus.
Turning away, he looks at his fingers and says, “Why can’t you guys get organized like that?”
Unity is strength.

That is the main thought on our minds as we come together today to give God thanks for the two great apostles, Peter and Paul.
In their lifetime Peter and Paul did not work so closely together.
Peter was called directly by Jesus and given “the keys of the kingdom” (Matthew 16:16-18).
He is portrayed in icons carrying the keys.
Paul, on the other hand, probably never met Jesus face to face.
Once a persecutor of the church, his conversion came about through a vision on the road to Damascus.
His inspiration and his style of presenting the gospel came from visions and charismatic experiences.
He is portrayed in icons carrying either a sword or a book. Peter and Paul were so different that Peter was surnamed the Apostle of the Jews and Paul the Apostle of the Gentiles.
Paul once had a public disagreement with Peter on whether Jewish Christians could eat together with Gentile Christians. (Galatians 2).

If Peter and Paul did not agree in life, they did agree in death.
Both suffered the same kind of death, martyrdom, in the same city, Rome, at about the same time, 64-67 a.d. 
The early church recognized Peter and Paul as the two pillars of the church of Christ.
This is depicted in an ancient icon with Peter on the right and Paul on the left, each extending a hand with which they bear up the church.
By placing two of them together in one icon, united in lifting up the church, the church is sending a message to all her children that they all likewise should be united, in spite of individual and local differences, in building up the one church of God.

In the early church there was a tendency to splinter into various factions, each faction claiming to follow the leadership of one of the chief apostles or missionaries.
This was one of the reasons why Paul wrote the first letter to the Corinthians.
The Corinthians were breaking up into followers of Paul, followers of Peter, and followers of Apollos.
Paul reminds them strongly that these human leaders are all equally servants of the one Christ.
Christ, therefore, should be their focus and not the human leaders.

If division among believers was a problem in the days of Paul, it is even more so today.
Like the Christians of Corinth, Christians today are divided, variously recognizing the absolute authority of John Calvin, John Wesley or John Paul.
We are like the weak fingers of Linus that cannot embrace one another and unite into a formidable punch. Disunity of Christians is a scandal that weakens the Christian witness to the world.
How can Christian churches preach love and unity, forgiveness and reconciliation to the world when they themselves are living in disunity, unable to forgive and reconcile themselves?
Even within the walls of the same church, there are visible cracks of disunity.

Today, the faithful are quick to label themselves either as conservatives or liberals.
Conservatives, who often identify with the institutional authority of Peter, wage war against liberals; and liberals, who identify with the charismatic vision of Paul, wage war against conservatives.
By combining the feasts of the apostles Peter and Paul, the church is inviting all her children to look beyond the conservative-liberal divide and discover a deeper level of unity in Christ.
The church of Christ needs the rock of Peter’s institutional leadership as well as the vitality of Paul’s charismatic vision.
Christian unity, like the unity of Peter and Paul, is not a unity in uniformity but a unity in diversity.

Today the church reminds us that, even though as individuals and local communities some will prefer the style of Peter and others that of Paul, we should not let that divide us since we are all, first and foremost, followers of the one Lord Jesus Christ and children of one Father, God

The Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ (Corpus Christi)





On this feast of the body of Christ, let's talk a little about what it might mean to be a body.
Not to have a body, but to be a body.

We have a certain amount of difficulty with this key concept of the Bible because we don't think in biblical terms.
Biblical language does not divide people into body and soul;
it sees us as simple units-
as enfleshed spirits or inspirited bodies.
That is why the Old Testament strikes us as being earthy-
why circumcision is a religious rite, and why menstruation rendered a woman ritually
The Old Testament is a rollicking, real, vibrant view of humanity in which flesh is given its due­ --
where sin was punished by bodily suffering, and goodness was rewarded by long physical life.

The same zest for blood-and guts living continued into the New Testament times.
They made no fine distinctions between body and soul, inside and outside, and thought and action.
Whatever you thought and did was who you were.
Jesus was never more Jewish than when He said "If you hate your brother you're a murderer-
if you lust after your sister you're an adulterer."
Being more finicky-or more philosophical-
we divide ourselves into body and soul.
So we experience ourselves as split in half, dichotomized, made of two parts that have to be brought back together.
But we never quite make the match, and our bodies always come off second best.


We may pamper our bodies, like spoiled children,
but we don't take them seriously-like spoiled children.
We play with them, we use and misuse them,
but we don't let them in our highest and lowest experiences­ B
precisely those experiences that make us human.
We do not cry over our sins nor do we dance before the tabernacle.

Our language belies our theory at every turn.
We say, 'My stomach hurts," but that is not entirely accurate.
My stomach does not hurt the way my car is broken.
My stomach is me, so I hurt.
This is not a medical nicety;
it is also the way we experience ourselves on the spiritual level.

We say, "I stole something," the same way we recite, "The cow jumped over the moon."
But it is not the same thing.
When I steal something, I am a thief.
Or we say, "I told a lie," as if that lie were lost somewhere in the universe far away from us.
No, that lie is lodged in my craw.
I didn=t tell a lie: I am a liar.

My body is not something separate from me that I may use or not use,
recognize or disown as I choose.
Whatever I do with my body, that is what I AM.
Of course, that also includes the good that I do.
When I do a kind deed, I AM kind.
When I have patience, I AM a patient person.

To appreciate fully what this means, it might be a good experiment next week to pay attention to the way we speak.
Instead of saying, "I did this or that," try saying, "I am this or that."
It ought to give intensity to our lives.

Enough said about our bodies-
what about the body of Christ?
His body is just like yours and mine-
whatever he does with his body is who HE IS.
Only there is so much more to him.
His divinity is so much bigger than his humanity that he cannot fully express himself through one physical body.
So he makes all of us parts of his body.

And because we are his body, whatever we do, we force him to do.
If we laugh, he laughs; if we cry, he cries;
if we do good, he does;
and if we sin, he sins.

Is that a little strong?
Don't listen to me -Read Corinthians, where it clearly says that if you lie with a whore, you make the body of Christ lie with a whore.
Paul may be a prude, but he is not squeamish.

We started by talking about language, and ended by talking about body language.
Both are very delicate things, so we should be careful.
It is true that there is a difference between the body of Christ and our own bodies.
But it is equally true that the connection between him and us is so close that God calls us his body.
If words mean anything at all, that surely means that whatever we do to any member of the body we do to him.
So be good to your bodies-
they don't belong to you.
They ARE you.
And they are CHRIST.


Wednesday, June 11, 2014

The Most Holy Trinity




Trinity Sunday             A God of love

Reading I          Exodus 34:4-6, 8-9 (renewal of the tablets)
Reading II         2 Corinthians 13:11-13 (farewell)
Gospel                                John 3:16-18 (belief in the Son sent by the Father)

Key Passage    For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life. (John 3:16)

Adult:   We live within the Trinity whenever we live in love. How does this mystery connect to your daily life?
Child:    How do you choose to live as a more loving person

Pentecost Sunday


Image:"Pentecost Fire"
© Jan Richardson
 

June 7, 2014



In the Gospel for the feast of the Ascension, the Church is given the great commission of making disciples of all the nations.
It was Jesus' work. It now becomes the Church's work.
In the Gospel for Pentecost, the Church is given the power of forgiving sins and making people right before God.
It was the Lord's work.
It now becomes the Church's work.
In other words, forgiveness is our work

Indeed, the whole ministry of the Lord is turned over to the Church.
But, of course, the ministry remains the Lord's ministry, for he and the Church make up one and the same body.
Jesus once said, "I have come to set the earth on fire, and how I wish it were already blazing!" (Luke 12:49).
He began the task so well!
Now, we must continue it!
It was not interrupted by his death: it is further empowered by his death.
His return to glory only adds immeasurable strength and grace to the effort.
It is up to us to catch the new Spirit and to cast the fire.

I always tire of politicians who want us to elect them so that our children and grandchildren will have a better future.
I always suspect their motives.
I'm a firm believer in making our leaders take care of our generation, our time and its challenges, and that we should not allow them to deflect our minds to some vague future.
It lets them off the hook; they don=t have to be accountable.

I suspect that there are Church leaders who likewise "cast their anchor" into the future rather than taking care of the present.
They write off the present generation and look instead, like politicians, to the future.
They say things are bad now, what with the scarcity of vocations, the departures from the priesthood, the scandals, the affluence, the false values, the hedonism, the violence, the egotism, and the lack of a generous heart.

But the future will be different! They say.
So, we must look to the future, side‑stepping the present.
They are wrong.
They are appointed to be the shepherds of the present, and not of some vague future.
The future is someone else's responsibility.

We must take care of our own time and our own place in salvation history.
The great commission means we must
 Cand Pentecost means we can.
We tend to see Pentecost as a mighty rush of the Spirit energizing all things with wonder and light and multiple conversions.
And that, surely, is part of it.
But Pentecost is also the quiet breath of the Spirit, speaking calmly within us about our unmoored time,
keeping us strong in faith and anchored in the present as we wonder about the next step,
informing our minds with possible solutions and new pastoral approaches,
and assuring our hearts that personal holiness is the most effective catechesis of all
. No generationCthe present one includedCis able to withstand the witness of saints.
Does the present generation see holiness and sanctity in the present set of shepherds?
Or does it see shepherds looking to the future, side‑stepping the present?

Is that what we are called to in our own time and place?
Is that the challenge of this generation to usCto be saintsCto witness to them by our holiness?
If it is, and if we achieve it with God's grace, thenCand then onlyCmay we happily write off this generation for a spiritual poverty of its own making.
But, until we are well on the way to holiness, write off nothing
B and don't expect too much!