Seventh Sunday Ordinary Time A

Matthew 5:38-48 

February 23, 2014

For scripture readings click here.

To understand today’s gospel we need to take into account the genre of this text.

It’s what New Testament scholar Robert Tannehill calls a "focal instance."

I prefer to call it a "sketchy scene."

"It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God."

"If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away."

"First take the log out of your own eye."

"Let the dead bury their own dead."

"If anyone strikes you . . .

If anyone wants to sue you and take your coat . . .

If anyone forces you to go one mile . . ."

These sayings picture a specific scene and make a command.

They are specific, exaggerated, and extreme.

They are not meant as blanket principles to fit all situations.

They function like a proverb, which is an ethical flashlight, not a floodlight, appropriate for some situations but not all.

Think, for example of "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh words stirs up anger.

In some situations, that's a wise word, but in others, a harsh, blunt word is called for.

Jesus' "sketchy scenes" contrast his teaching with conventional human behavior and induce a new way of looking at such topics as judging others (Mt 7:3-5), inward motives and outward behavior (Mt 5:29-30), retaliation (Mt 5:39-42), private piety and public opinion (Mt 6:1-7), family ties (Mt 10:34-36) and the call of God's kingdom (Mt 8:21-22)

Jesus doesn't intend for us to cut off our own feet, tear out our own eyes, pull logs out of our eyes, stand still while someone slaps us twice, and skip our own father's funerals.

He wants to make our habitual, deeply ingrained patterns of behavior seem strange to us.

Do Unto Others as They Have Done Unto You?
The Old Testament law contained what is known as the lex talionis, (Ex 21:24; Lev 24:20;Dt 19:21), known as "an eye for an eye."

It was the principle of "negative reciprocation": an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot, a burn for a burn, a wound for a wound, a stripe for a stripe.

While negative reciprocation sounds cruel to contemporary ears, it was designed to set limits on vendettas.

Extract the injury that was inflicted on you and it ends there.

The eye-for-an-eye principle was not unique to the Hebrew Bible, but was known throughout the ancient world.

Matthew's Jesus is not recommending a blanket policy of non-resistance, say when weak and vulnerable members of a community are threatened with violence.

Nor is he dismissing the validity of negative consequences for negative behavior (10:32-33; 6:14-15).

He is saying that "an eye for an eye" is not a legitimate motto for his followers when they suffer personal insult or injury.