Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Advent 4 C

Image: "For Joy," 
©Jan Richardson.

December 20, 2015

The gospel today begins with a journey.
“Mary set out and traveled to the hill country in haste…”
This time of year, I think, a lot of us can appreciate the idea of taking a trip. Millions of Americans take holiday vacations.
But what Mary does here is hardly a vacation.
She has just been told that she is to be the Mother of God.
And rather than keeping this news to herself, or wondering how she will cope, she sets out on a journey, to visit her cousin, Elizabeth — and we have this momentous scene that follows, The Visitation.

Not only does Mary take this journey to a town of Judah but, with this event, the great journey of her LIFE begins – an adventure that will not end until her final journey, to heaven, on the feast we celebrate today, the Assumption.
We tend to think of the Blessed Mother as a quiet, serene figure – a woman of few words, but blessed with tremendous faith, and boundless trust.
This is true.
But this morning, I’d like to ask you to think of her a little differently.
Think of her also as a woman of action.

She is a woman on a continual journey — constantly, by necessity, on the move. She is restless, rarely sitting still or staying in one place.
After this journey to see Elizabeth, we next find Mary embarking on an arduous trip, while pregnant, to Bethlehem.
After giving birth, she and her small family are on the move again, fleeing to Egypt, to escape death.
We meet her again, traveling to Jerusalem, where her son goes missing – and we follow her as she goes in search of him.
Finding him, she continues her travels, bringing him home to Nazareth.

Mary, as the first disciple, in many ways prefigures all the disciples who will follow – those who traveled, mostly on foot, throughout the world to spread the gospel and proclaim the good news.
Like those apostles, Mary was a missionary – the first missionary, a woman who traveled and carried Christ to the world.
In today’s gospel, we see her, literally, bringing Jesus to another, as she carries him in her womb and goes to her cousin and speaks the words any missionary might pronounce – words which are the very essence of The Good News, and the beginning of all belief:
“My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord.”

What follows, the Magnificat, is Mary’s great gift to scripture, one of its most beautiful prayers.
 It is prayed every evening in the Liturgy of the Hours by millions around the world. With that, Mary’s great acclamation becomes the Church’s.
We can only imagine what other travels she took in the course of her life … but we can’t forget one in particular, the most difficult of all, as she followed her son on HIS journey to Calvary…

…Her life is closely entwined with ours.
All of us, like Mary, are on a journey.
All of us are traveling to places we may not understand, to destinations we cannot see.
This is life.
But we ask Mary to help guide us on our way.

The road is long. The journey isn’t easy.
We pray to have the trust in God that we need to travel whatever road we must take – just as Mary did.
And we pray, too, that one day our journeying will lead us to meet her face to face – in that place prepared for her, that destination that became her home, and where she waits for us, with a mother’s love and a mother’s hope.


Third Sunday of Advent C




December 2015


Sisters and brothers: rejoice in the Lord always. I shall say it again, rejoice.”
St. Paul commands this in the second reading
The word for rejoice in Latin is gaudete, so quite naturally this Sunday is called Gaudete Sunday.
Why all this exultation? Are we finally getting a break from the somberness of Advent?
Yes, but there is more to it than that.
Remember that Advent is like a retreat that the worldwide Church is making.
In this upcoming third week we will consider our lives in the context of the great beauty God has put in us and around us.
Can you think this way?
One line in the First Reading puts it in dramatic terms.
Zephaniah says that the Lord “will sing joyfully because of you, as one sings at festivals.”
Because of you!
Have you ever in your life thought that God might be singing because of you?
Have you ever let your image of God expand that far?
 Have you ever let him, in the most profound sense of the word, be one who sings you into existence?

In one of the books of Narnia by C. S. Lewis, the children are taken back to the very moment of creation.
They hear the voice of Aslan (the Christ figure) singing into the wilderness.
When the voice goes high, birds, clouds, blue sky appear.
At a certain lengthy turn of melody the mountains laboriously raise their heads.
A low hum vibrates forth the depths of seas.
Creation seems to be made out of melody.
Maybe it is.
Scientists still contend about it, however.
What is the physical universe composed of, particles or waves? (I think that is the choice.)
Einstein and many others tried to reconcile them, but no luck.
If I could come even close to describing “string theory,” we might have a third contention about the universe’s makeup.
Maybe you have seen TV shows about string theory on PBS or elsewhere, a model that some scholars actually do believe unites the two hypotheses.
These strings act a lot like sound does.
Like the vibrations that come forth from a violin string.

Instead of saying that particles or waves or uncertainty or whatever else are the basis of matter and force-fields and so on, these scientists instead postulate string-like particles—infinitesimal, ever changing, wriggling. By their dancing shapes these string circles generate (or constitute, or become, or whatever is the right way to say it) everything that is.
How about this for a possibility:
God’s gladness sings out joyfully at every instant,
and his song is the earth, the galaxies, the people and plants and chemicals and soaring hawks and encircling planets, droplets of dew and heavy black holes, youthful beauties, ancient wisdoms, and everything else that exists.
We are God’s song
Apply this, please, to Sunday’s Gospel.
People in long rows gather to be baptized in expectation of the Savior who is to come.
Each segment (the crowd, the tax collectors, the soldiers) ask John the Baptist the exact same question: “Teacher, what should we do?”
“Let your life sing,” he answers.
Let it sing.
Let your life be what it is: God’s joyous, interleaved and always consonant melody, sounding outwards in deepest joy.
Share your cloak and your food, collect only what is owed, do not extort, do these things and you will be sounding the true melody of your of your life.




Second Sunday of Advent C


Image: "Prepare," 
©Jan Richardson.

December 6, 2015


Our minds have a mind of their own.
Thoughts think themselves, seemingly undirected by the thinker.
The discovery of this simple and undeniable facet of our makeup can be quite startling.
We fantasize we are in complete control of mental processes.
However, the actual situation seems to be quite different.
When we concentrate, we can focus thinking along a certain path.
But if we relax attention, certain automatic mental processes kick in.
The automatic process that concerns John the Baptist is how we deal with the wounds that have been inflicted on us and the wounds we have inflicted on others.
In religious language, his focus is on how the mind seduces us into identifying with sin.

There is an adhesive quality about sinful experiences. They stick.
We remember the beatings, the humiliations, the hateful glances, and the mocking words.
The wrongs done to us are available to memory in a way neutral and even positive experiences are not.
Although the experience of sin begins with being sinned against, we are quick learners in this way of being human.
We soon learn to wound others.
We engage in hitting, lying, cheating, betraying, etc.
We need to protect and promote ourselves at all costs.
Any behavior that appears to further this narrow and intense self-preoccupation we embrace.
Soon we can tell our life story in term of blows received and blows given.
It is a tale of sin; and even if we repress it, it secretly shapes our sense of who we are.

This attraction of the mind to the negative has a cumulative effect.
As the mind simultaneously nurtures a sense of victimhood and wallows in guilt over its own mistakes, sin rises to a new status in the interior life. We gradually begin to identity with the sinful dimension of our lives.
In our own eyes, we become, above all else, one who has been sinned against and one who sins in turn.
We are the receiver and giver of blows, and the highest compliment is, "He gave as good as he got."
The mind is convinced this is the "real us," and it defends this identity by citing facts and providing rationalizations.
Nothing can disprove this obvious truth.

However, there is an important distinction to be made in telling this inner story of sin.
The distinction is between what has happened and what the mind does with what has happened.
We really have been maltreated, victims of the wrongdoing of others; and we really have maltreated others, making them victims of our wrongdoing.
Not to acknowledge this active participation in the sin of the world is to be either incredibly dense or in chronic denial.
But the point is not the sheer factuality of moral evil. The point is what the mind does with these experiences.
It enthrones them as the secret and irreversible truth about the human person.
Sinner becomes the depth identity, the loudest interior noise that blocks out any refuting voices.
The result is an ever-deepening connection of who we are with the wrongs done to us and by us.

Our identification with sin becomes a serious roadblock—a mountain in the way, a winding and rough path that means slow travel, a valley that delays arrival.
 Jesus cannot get to us with his radical address that we are the light of the world, the salt of the earth.
When we cling to our identity as sinner, his words cannot penetrate the armor of our hardened self-evaluation.
He is not the One Who Is to Come, but the One Sin Keeps Away.
That is why John the Baptist is needed as preparation for Christ.
He enables people to go beyond the mind and let go of sins.

This repentance that leads to the forgiveness of sins is a subtle process, but it is not an impossible one.
Two key insights often help us.
The first insight involves our awareness of the nature of the mind.
When we become aware of the powerful tendency of the mind to hold onto sin, we are already beyond it.
We see what it is doing, and so we are more than it.
We transcend the mind by noticing how it works.
When this happens, a sense of spaciousness replaces the sense of restriction and a sense of freedom replaces the sense of compulsion.
We feel we have walked through a door into a hidden room that feels like home.
We are closer to who we really are.

The second insight involves an implication of the basic Christian conviction of the unconditional forgiveness of God.
God is ultimate reality and, therefore, if God holds the sin, the sin transcends the flow of time and remains permanently present.
But if God has let go of the sin, then who is holding on?
The forgiveness of God clears the way for us to see where the real action is.
The real action is the mind and how it clings to negative evaluations. The question changes from "Will God forgive me?" to "How can I go beyond the mind that clings to sin, even though God has forgiven me?"

Before we can hear the words that Jesus heard, “you are my beloved child, in you I am well pleased,” we will have to undergo John’s baptism which entails a repentance that leads to the forgiveness of sins.

If we do this, the path is cleared.

First Sunday of Advent C

Image: "Drawing Near," 
©Jan Richardson.

November 29, 2015


Why do we have Advent?
You say, “I don’t know, it always just comes along.” Or, “to prepare for Christmas.”
But Christmas came long ago, and if Christ has already been born, what is this Advent waiting about?
“Have we forgotten about his birthing?”
 I have heard these questions, answers, and others, a number of times.
So let us look at his birth and at our forgetfulness.

Our hearts get drowsy and lazy, tired out by the anxieties of daily life.
Maybe we distract ourselves from troubles by working very hard, or becoming depressed, or becoming fascinated with drink, or sex, or out-of-control emotions, or gambling, or email, or golf, or surfing the web, or pride, or, or, or (name yours).
Whatever it is for you, the very clear message of Advent is, “Settle down for a while.”
Open the door just a crack to let God in.

There is a design to help us do this.
Each week’s First Reading is the carrot: usually positive, a promise of good.
 Then the Gospel hits you with a big stick to wake us up.
Take the encouraging First Reading this Sunday.
It reminds us of the promise God made to his people: rightness and justice will come to the earth.
Security. The day of the Lord will arrive, though long delayed.
Peace in our day.

How rewarding it is to desire such a time.
Too good to be true?
 Just pious thought?
Read the First Reading again later and ask yourself those questions. Spend time with them. Pray to God for help.
The Responsorial Psalm will aid you. It asks God to make known his ways to us, to guide us and teach us.
The Second Reading urges us to put God’s promise of peace into action, even if we are not yet sure what it means.
Love others and be loved.
Ah, and then the Gospel.
It tries to wake us up, especially if the above has not helped.
“But I am perfectly awake,” you say.
Alright then, go ahead and read the Gospel again later
.
Signs in the sun, moon and stars, nations in dismay, the roaring of the sea and the waves, people dying of fright, and the Son of Man appearing in the clouds with power and great glory!
Terrifying.

So are you all ready for it?
 Let yourself imagine what such a time might be like.
Picture it scene by scene and don’t worry about being exact. Just experience it.
Will such a shakeup really happen literally?
We do not know.
Maybe much worse is to come, judging from the state of the world today.
Do you live without fear of terrorists or ISIS, of proliferating nuclear weapons, of horrific climate change, of a crash of the world economy, or of the greed that fills so many hearts to overflowing—in your city, in your state, your world?

If you can say “You are right, I am afraid of these,” then you have a start on the reason for Advent.
Christ has to be born afresh.
 Yes, it worked the last time, but you and I forget so easily.
His birth must happen again, in our liturgy, in our lives, in this Advent, so that his sacrifice will not be in vain.

This is why we have Advent.

The Solemnity Our Lord Jesus Christ, King of the Universe



November 22, 2015


Once there was a king named Arthur.
You remember him, the one who thought up the Round Table and had Lancelot as his knight and Guinevere as his wife.

Long before he became king, in fact when he was just an infant in the cradle, a strange thing happened.
The nurse stepped out for a moment and, quick as a wink, Merlin the magician stepped in and then stepped back out …

… taking the boy with him.

This was not a kidnapping.
Merlin was a kindly old magician and his job was to let the boy grow up as a normal—not a spoiled, pampered or “royal”—person.
He was not to be miles above the people and the animals and the tiny, precious specks of beauty in the most surprising places in our lives.
He was to live with us.

Merlin transported Arthur to a bedraggled castle ruled by a third-rate Lord named Sir Ector.
The people were nice enough, and ordinary, and the nooks and crannies of the castle were perfect for a little kid to hide in and the halls for him to run in.
All the servants and even the lords and ladies were his friends.
How could they not be? He was just an ordinary boy, though he would be king one day.
They called him Wart (which in those days rhymed with Art, which is short for Arthur).

Merlin, funny old character, decided to educate Wart in a special way. He changed the boy into various and sundry animals, each for a time.
He turned him into a hawk, for instance—to witness first-hand the world as it appeared in a hawk's eyes.
Or a fish. In fact, especially a fish because Wart then could attend a formal school of fishes and learn from their master.

Now, it seems that Jesus had a few things in common with the Wart.
As a boy Jesus was not called “King” or “your highness” any more than Wart was referred to as “your majesty.”
Jesus was called “Jesus,”** a common name in those days.
He played outside, helped his dad, rolled in the mud, cut his finger, even helped birds to fly.
And his mom was his very most favorite person.

He had a teacher who was even better at teaching than Merlin.
It was the Spirit of God.
It helped him through creeks and cubbyholes of the earth and made him friends with the funny sweet people who lived all around.

Both Wart and Jesus did grow up to be the kings they were meant to be. But they brought new images of a king.
Their love was not just for the noble and the mighty but for everyone. They were lowly.
Jesus was “king” because he understood every minutest texture of everyone’s life and world.

Pilate asked Jesus if he were a king.
He was, specifically, but not in any way Pilate could have imagined.
Smallness was his power.
Persuasion was his scepter, along with an amazing ability to teach.
And so, he was Christ the King.
Oh, I almost forgot. I typed a wrong key when I began writing, and hit a “d” instead of a “g” at the end of the word King.
It came out “Christ the Kind.”

This is who we find waiting for us on this Sunday.

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

It's time to lose luxury


Instead of seeking out luxury, use your resources to build bonds of solidarity and love.
at follows this essay.
In 2013, Pope Francis banished a bishop who was scandalizing the church in Germany because of building a lavish $34 million residence. The German media dubbed him the "luxury bishop.” From the very beginning of his papacy, when he paid his own hotel bill and chose a small car, Francis has walked the Christian walk and impressed many by doing so. He has said in an address to seminarians and novices that it “truly grieves me to see a priest or a nun with the latest model of a car,” asking them to pick a more “humble” one. He concludes: “And if you like the beautiful one, only think of all the children who are dying of hunger. That’s all! Joy is not born from, does not come from things we possess!” The pope is serious about clergy and religious being witnesses to simple living.
But it’s always easier to pick on the sins of others. What about the sin of luxury in our own lives? Hasn’t “too much” become an ordinary, acceptable standard in our own homes and parking lots? The philosophers of the ancient world and the prophets of the Israelites were united in criticizing such displays of excess wealth, and from Plato on, the term “luxury” was applied to this vice. They weren’t against all possessions; they just thought there was a line, an “acquisitive ceiling” (in historian Brad Gregory’s words), beyond which humans shouldn’t go. Luxury meant an inordinate desire for possessions—and as the story of the luxury bishop illustrates, we continue to share a sense that things can go overboard. But don’t we go overboard all the time in our daily lives?
It is true that Jesus’ disturbing commands to leave all possessions behind have never been applied to all Christians. We do not all have to be St. Francis. But on the other hand, we shouldn’t ignore these commands. Glen Stassen and David Gushee suggest Christians try to avoid the problem of luxury by spiritualizing it to death; we tell ourselves we can have possessions, as long as we are “detached” from them. Yet if we are really detached, then we should be able to discern and reject excess as luxury.
But where do we draw the line? In his speech above, Pope Francis joked that someone might respond to him by saying, “So, Father, you are telling us to use a bike?” No, he said, cars are useful for getting certain things done, but that one did not need “fancy” for that. The pope’s example points us to how we name luxury. To discern it in our own lives, we need to ask the question: What are possessions for?
The word “sin” is derived from a Greek word for “missing the mark.” You can only know sin if you know the target at which you’re aiming. Our possessions, according to the Catechism (#2402), have two purposes or targets: to meet the basic needs of our household and to “allow for a natural solidarity” to be built uniting people. We go overboard—and miss the mark—when we use possessions to create and serve false needs in ourselves and to foster rivalries among people. That’s the vice of luxury: We want lots of things we don’t really need, and getting those things incites envy and competition with others. It’s a vice because we become habituated to it; it’s as if we are accustomed to pursuing fancier stuff even when it’s clearly unnecessary and the old stuff works fine.
In the back of our minds, I think we know the truth of these statements. We know keeping up with the Joneses is silly, and we know that stuff won’t ultimately lead to our happiness. Indeed, a lot of studies by social scientists back up our intuitions. Excess stuff and materialistic competition with others don’t make for higher levels of happiness. Yet we seem unable to stop as a society, constantly escalating everything material. And besides, isn’t that new iPhone just…so cool?!
It is cool—magical, even. But here’s where we face a particular problem in today’s world with luxury that the ancient thinkers never imagined. We have a whole industry of marketing dedicated to telling you over and over how “magical” this or that consumer item is. Why? Because we will spend more money if we’re convinced of the magic. One marketing book for makers of high-end products reminds them that they are selling not simply a material thing, but a “feeling,” a “desire to feel special.” Another marketer suggests luxury products correspond to a “dream” and a “quest,” and yet another praises a certain tech company seen by its millions of devotees as not “just a brand” but a “religion.”
From a Catholic perspective, we should recognize the potential magic in material things. We even have a word for it: sacrament. But it’s a very different kind of magic. Beyond the seven sacraments, many Catholic thinkers talk about a “sacramental worldview” in which we are constantly building up the spiritual relationship with God and neighbor through the material world. The most common example? The gift. Gifts—before they became objects of marketing frenzy—were seen as an example of sharing material goods in service of the invisible bonds of social solidarity.
Pope Benedict put this “astonishing experience of gift” at the center of his writings on the Catholic economy. He said we should strive to make all our economic interactions with others have a quota of gift within them. This possibility of gift, of a sharing of excess to build up human relationships, is the real magic latent in our possessions. The marketers of luxury simply want to redirect it; they know material goods aren’t just material goods, but they try to convince us that the magic is about an experience for yourself or an exclusivity that sets you in a special club above others (who don’t or can’t have the luxury).
Thus, we really have a choice. If we are fortunate enough to have excess possessions, will we hit or miss the target? Will we pursue the illusory magic of luxury or will we make of our excess a sacrament for God and for others? It’s not wrong to have possessions or even excess possessions. As I said, not everyone receives the call seen often in the Gospel to leave everything for Jesus. But that doesn’t mean everyone else is off the hook, especially those of us living in the richest country in the history of the world. Instead, we too have a choice.
And that’s a choice many of us face every day. Bishop Robert Barron writes that when you are faced with any purchase, ask yourself: Can I do with less? Or can I do without? Like starting an exercise program, this can be painful at first, but after a while, it’s liberating…especially since it frees up other possibilities for the resources. This is probably the most important point. Instead of luxury, we can use our resources to build bonds of solidarity and love through our purchasing.
For example, buy something handcrafted with real love and skill. Or buy from the farmer who actually cares well for his animals and his land. You pay a bit more, but that’s exactly the quota of gift Benedict talks about. You don’t pay more for some phony magic. You pay more in order to make the purchase a sacramental exchange, an effective sign of God’s grace active in the world and in your life. That’s hitting the target. And if Catholics do this regularly, and do it together, the world will respond to our parishes much the same way it has responded to Francis: By recognizing we are people who actually walk the walk.

To take survey click here and go to end of article.

The future map of religions reveals a world of change for Christians, Muslims, and Jews


Projected Annual Growth Rate of Country Populations, 2010-2050
c. 2015 Religion News Service
(RNS) Muslims will overtake Christians by the end of this century. India, now mostly Hindu, will become the world’s largest Muslim country. The numbers of people with no religious identity will soar in the United States and Europe, but the unaffiliated will lose worldwide market share as Christians maintain a steady growth.
All these changes are drawn from the Pew Research Center’s new  projections, released Thursday (April 2), that map global faith traditions and how they’re likely to shift by 2050. The report says nothing about the transcendent message of any religion. It makes no claims about believers’ level of devotion or practice.
Instead, it’s a story of nitty-gritty statistics: Which group is having babies (lots of babies or just a few)? Which ones have many young people, and which are slowly graying out? Whose followers are on the move—from one nation to another, or switching religions?
“Demographics are an underappreciated force that is shifting the contours of faith,” said Conrad Hackett, the Pew demographer who led the six-year study. Hackett analyzed projected changes for Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, folk religions, other minority religions and the unaffiliated.
Islam Growing Fastest
Those contours matter. The Pew Research Center doesn’t delve into political forecasting, but readers of the report’s projections from 2010 to 2050 might feel a thumb press down on many sore spots and raise questions beyond the scope of Pew’s data:
* Will prejudice against Muslims rise as the percentage of people in Europe who are Muslim climbs to 10.2 percent, up from today’s 5.9 percent?  “The projected growth rate is only about 1 percentage point a decade,” said Hackett. “But it’s a very visible change: More people wearing veils, more behaving in culturally distinct ways.”
* Who will assume the minority voice in the U.S. public square as Muslims outpace Jews as the country’s third-largest group, after Christians and the unaffiliated?
* Will religious tensions flare as India becomes the world’s most populous Muslim nation, supplanting Indonesia? “The quality of interfaith relations in such a country (about to pass China as the world’s most populous) will be of global importance,” said Alan Cooperman, Pew’s director of religion research.
* How will more secular regions such as Europe and the U.S. relate to deeply religious regions, such as sub-Saharan Africa, divided among Christians and Muslims?
“The question is: ‘How will we understand each other?’” said Cooperman. “Sub-Saharan Africa is 12 percent of the world population now, and it will be 20 percent by 2050. That’s huge growth for people to get their heads around.”
The report, sponsored by the Pew-Templeton Global Religious Futures project, offers many more head-spinning numbers and a religion-by-religion, region-by-region analysis of data from 198 countries and territories, representing nearly all the world’s population. “No one has done anything like this before, so we had no idea about the big picture,” said Hackett.
Among the major findings:
* “As of 2010, Christianity was by far the world’s largest religion, with an estimated 2.2 billion adherents, nearly a third of the Earth’s 6.9 billion people. Islam came in second, with 1.6 billion adherents, or 23 percent of the global population.” Four in 10 of all the world’s Christians will live in sub-Saharan Africa by 2050.
* While Christian numbers will continue to grow, Muslims, who are younger and have  a higher birth rate, will outpace them. By 2050, “there will be near parity between Muslims (2.8 billion, or 30 percent of the population) and Christians (2.9 billion, or 31 percent), possibly for the first time in history.” Barring unforeseen events—war, famine, disease, political upheaval and more—Muslim numbers will surpass Christians after 2070.
Age Distribution of Religious Groups, 2010
* Worldwide, the unaffiliated will fall from 16 percent to 13 percent. Christians, Muslims and Hindus live in areas with “bulging youth populations,” high birthrates and falling levels of infant morality, the report said. Even the global tally for Jews is expected to rise, based on the high birthrate of Orthodox Jews in Israel. Meanwhile, the unaffiliated are “heavily concentrated in places with low fertility and aging populations, such as Europe, North America, China and Japan,” the report said.
* Nearly two-thirds of all the unaffiliated worldwide live in China, the research found. “If Chinese authorities allow greater freedom of religion, the share of unaffiliated in the world population could shrink even more dramatically than the report predicts,” said Ariela Keysar, associate director of the Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture, who consulted on the project.
* While religious switching has a significant impact in North America and Europe, in many countries, changing one’s religion is difficult — if not illegal. There’s no data on religious switching among China’s 1.3 billion people, with nearly 50 percent of them in the unaffiliated ranks, for example. But in the 70 countries where survey data was available, the report found that Buddhists and Jews are the primary losers on the switch-in/switch-out balance sheet, Hackett said.  “In the USA, there are famous converts like Richard Gere, but there’s a lot of disaffiliation among those who grew up Buddhist.”
* In the U.S., Christians will decline, from more than three-quarters of the population (78.3 percent) in 2010 to two-thirds (66.4 percent) in 2050. Religious “churn”—people leaving their childhood faith for a different faith or none at all—is the primary driver of change.
* The Muslim share of the U.S. population is projected to climb to 2.1 percent, up from less than 1 percent today. Jews will fall from 1.8 percent to 1.4 percent.
* In 2010, there were 159 countries with a Christian majority, but that will fall by eight countries, including France, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand.  By 2050, Muslims will hold the majority in 51 countries, up by two from 2010, including Nigeria, which just elected a Muslim president, and the Republic of Macedonia.
“In many ways the value of projects like this is not to say what the world will look like in 2050. The world could change,” said Cooperman. “But they tell us about the world today and the recent path. Peering into the future greatly illuminates what is happening today and its consequences.”
- See more at: http://www.uscatholic.org/news/201504/future-map-religions-reveals-world-change-christians-muslims-and-jews-29969#sthash.KO91tgF5.dpuf

Catholics and Muslims: A common cause





Interfaith harmony demands a mutual respect for human dignity. In Jordan, Father Nabil Haddad is working to make that happen.
Father Nabil Haddad wants you to visit Jordan. Although his desk in Amman is a long way from the homes of most U.S. Catholics, Father Nabil says the troubled region needs attention. Catholics, he says, need to show support for persecuted Christians who seek refuge in Jordan. And Westerners, he says, cannot continue to watch from afar.
Haddad, a priest in the Melkite Catholic Church, is the founder and director of the Jordanian Interfaith Coexistence Research Center (JICRC). He is well known both in Jordan and internationally for his work in interfaith relations, primarily between Muslim and Christian groups in the Middle East.
“Come,” he says. “Pray with us. Eat with us. Talk to us. Visits from you are the best manifestation of solidarity.”
It’s with this same sense of urgency that Haddad has focused his work in Jordan—an aberrantly safe country in a turbulent region that faces many threats, most recently that of the self-proclaimed Islamic State (also knows as ISIS).
Last summer, when ISIS took control of Iraq’s second largest city, Mosul, the extremist group also drove Christians out of areas that have been their homes since the first century after Christ.
As these Christians along with other persecuted minorities seek refuge in Jordan, Haddad has worked not only to promote tolerance between Christians and Muslims but also to form an alliance of all Jordanians working together for peace.
What was it like growing up as a Catholic in a Muslim country? 
I was born and raised in the northern part of Jordan, the same part of the country where the prophet Elijah was born. I’m a descendant of an old Arab tribe here that is called the Sassanids. This big tribe existed and lived in this part of the Middle East for a very long time. Christians are small in number here, but we have a very long history. 
 
In my early childhood years, I went to kindergarten at a Catholic school. But because my father was serving in the military, for elementary school I went to a public school for the dependents of the people in the military. It followed the same curriculum as other public schools, so Islamic education class was mandatory for Muslims. For Christians it was not mandatory, but I did not have any problem attending a class on Islam. I was a Catholic boy who attended Mass every morning before school. And I was an altar boy, but I did not have a prejudice against being in the Islamic education class.
 
On many, many occasions, I would be the first to answer the questions of the teacher who, in those years, was a Muslim imam. Sometimes I was asked if I would recite passages from the Holy Quran. I would get rewards and prizes. Sometimes the imam would say, “Let’s give him a hand!” 
 
That experience added so much to my formation in the later years that I spent in the seminary. I joke that I speak Arabic better than 99.99 percent of the Muslims of this world. I studied Islam. I love the Arabic language.
 
This gives me so much added value when I talk to my Muslim neighbors because they know I come from a background that understands Islam and the Quran. On many occasions they praise the fact that an Arab Christian and Arab priest knows and loves the Arabic language, which is the language of the Holy Quran. Sometimes I use this as one of the commonalities to connect with Muslim audiences. But this, by no means, has affected my very close relationship with the Catholic Church.
 
Are there parts of the Quran that you find useful to know today?
Yes, indeed. There is the sura that talks of St. Mary. I admire the respect and reverence for the Virgin Mary in the Holy Quran. There is also the sura that talks about the obedience and respect we need to give our parents. That is also the fourth commandment. I also refer to the oneness of God that is proclaimed in the Holy Quran.
 
I concentrate on these instances because this is what we have in common. I don’t quote the Holy Quran, but on many occasions I reference commonalities between Islam and Christianity. It’s not a matter of admiring Islam but admiring the common living that existed for many centuries.
 
You’ve been advocating for greater appreciation of Islam among Christians. When did you start working toward this goal?
This concentration started after 2001, after 9/11. Because of the schism that we saw in the world, and how some people were starting to view Islam, I thought it was very important for Christians to clarify things on both sides.
 
I came up with the idea that Christians need to work together with Muslims to make changes from within our society in Jordan. At the same time, I needed to speak my intentions and objectives in a way that Muslims would accept. This is where I refer to examples from history and Islam. I always concentrate on the fact that the teachings of Islam call for the respect and acceptance of both Christians and Jews.
 
That’s how I appealed to the hearts and minds of Muslims. I built a rapport and friendship through which I was able to serve my own people and my community. I was able to convey a message, and I believe that concentrating on my Christian love was a good method of evangelization.
 
How do you, as a Catholic priest, approach dialogue with Muslims?
My calling is to be a Christian in a society with a Muslim majority. A Christian is a Christian whether here or in France, Japan, or South Africa. A Catholic priest is a Catholic priest in any part of the world. But the terminology we need to use is different. Spreading a Christian message to the Muslims is different than giving a sermon from the pulpit 
on Sunday.
 
I tell them, “I remind you to be good Muslims as much as I remind myself to be a good Christian.” I try to make it easier for my Muslim friends to understand my Christianity in very Arabic terminology. I show them this respect as an Arab Christian, as an interfaith activist, and as someone who has an image of being liked by the Muslim community. 
 
I try to use this in a very positive way to convey a very Christian message that needs to be understood by every Muslim. I admire their understanding.
 
How can Muslims and Christians help to prevent the distortion of Islam by radical groups like ISIS?
Muslims and Christians need to form an alliance against ideological extremism. This endeavor will show Muslims that they are not alone. But moderation needs courage. And these days, it needs additional courage because the extremists have a louder voice. They are the ones trying to influence the majority.
 
The strategy from my visceral point of view is to shift from dividing ourselves, with Islam on one side and the West and the Christians on the other. I connect, I build, I support, I join hands with Muslims to remind them that we need to be building peace, love, and mercy—not extremism, hate, killing, and bloodshed. I remind Muslims that they are doing themselves a favor. They are not doing non-Muslims a favor. They are doing themselves a favor by saving Muslims who have not become radicalized.
 
Has the rise of radical extremists made your peace-building work more challenging?
Yes. In Jordan, we have some worries as Christians. Jordan is not isolated. It’s secure, but it is in a very turbulent region. Syria, Iraq, North Israel, South Lebanon—they are all around us. We see the persecution. We see the murders. We see ISIS. We have ISIS supporters in Jordan. There are ISIS sleeper cells here. 
 
But I don’t isolate the Christians’ worries from the worries of any Muslims. It would be very threatening for Christians not to coexist with Muslims. Christians must understand, here in Jordan and everywhere, that to be isolated by religion or to live in a Christian ghetto is very dangerous. Unfortunately, this is what we saw happen in Iraq. 
 
Let’s take Egypt as an example. Before the second revolution in 2013, Christians were isolated and faced discrimination. Intense clashes between Christians and Muslims during the 2011 Arab Spring uprising created a climate of fear that prompted an estimated 100,000 Coptic Christians to flee Egypt. Isolation for Christians means suicide.
 
But it will be fatal if Christians see danger as only affecting Christians. We melt within our society as Jordanians, and we need to confront the rise of extremism together in one Jordanian alliance.
 
Are you seeing more examples of Christians and Muslims coming together?
This is happening every day. If you see what is taking place on social media, you will see there are debates between Muslims and ideological extremists. For instance, I saw an extremist on Facebook call on Muslims to not socialize with Christians on Christmas because he said Christians were infidels. 
 
But people responded to the extremist’s comment and said a true Muslim would not do this. I saw that this response came not from the Christians but rather from moderate Muslims. The moderates were attacking the extremists for the way that they interpreted the Islamic faith.
 
I also saw Muslims and Christians get together on Christmas. In my own church, in my own house, I had Muslim friends who came to congratulate us on Christmas. It is not done as an artificial gesture but a manifestation of this fraternity between Muslims and Christians. It has become more and more a part of the strategy in the daily life of Jordanians as we face the threat and reality of ISIS.
 
Now both Christians and Muslims who fear the threat of ISIS know they need to work together. We need to have this kind of friendly relationship, this amicable way of life, to stand against ISIS. 
 
How are Christians and Muslims in Jordan working together on a broader scale?
In February, we celebrated World Interfaith Harmony Week. This is an initiative that was very Jordanian at the beginning. It was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in 2010, and it was adopted unanimously. We called on all houses of worship—churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, etc.—to talk about two commandments: love of God and love of our neighbors. 
 
The idea is that we are building harmony. We keep telling people that we need to show our love of God by showing love to our neighbor. It’s about time people realize there will be no dialogue in the interfaith community if we do not respect human dignity. 
 
This concept is not about working on interfaith dialogue by discussing theories or theology. It is about concentrating on the common values we share as human beings. For me, I am a Christian. As a Catholic priest, I talk about the Christian understanding of love.
 
For Muslims, they could choose to talk about mercy. Islam is talked about as the religion of mercy. We need to show love and mercy. Love and mercy cannot be rooted deeply in our daily practice if we do not remember our concern for the dignity of the human being.
 
This is the major terminology that we find in common between Islam and Christianity. For Christians, we talk about being created in the image of God. That is the greatest dignity a human being can have, to be made in the image of our God, our creator. Muslims believe in the same thing. This is what we have in common: the dignity of the human being.
 
I recently helped start an initiative called “Muslims and Christians Together for Human Dignity.” We need to defend it. And in this region, I believe human dignity is in jeopardy for everyone. We need to work very gently to protect it.
 
We also need to remind each other that God gave us this dignity. We need to respect God and obey God by showing our respect for human dignity, which we see in everyone. When we respect this dignity in others, we are respecting God.
 
How has Jordan been affected by the influx of refugees from surrounding countries in the wake of ideological extremism?
We have almost 1 million Muslim and Christian refugees from Syria and Iraq living in Jordan right now. It is very important to consider the region as a disaster area. Here I have seen that Christians are suffering.
 
It’s so very unfortunate, and we are living this dilemma with our brothers and sisters. We are giving them housing and food. We are giving them all the support we can. In my church, we are hosting families from Iraq, and we are working with other church organizations to provide support.
 
But the one thing we want to tell our brothers and sisters who are the victims of ideological extremism is that here in Jordan, they are not refugees. They are our guests, and we are here to serve them. This is a very strong message for both Muslims and Christians in our country. 
 
This effort is mandatory. In this region, because Jordan is so close to these events, to these tragedies, I think it is our mission to raise our voice. We must speak with wisdom and tell the truth of this region to the whole world.
 
The plight of Iraqi Christians is very important for this region to realize. It is not the duty of the Catholic Church or Christians in general to address this situation alone. It is the duty of the whole world, the international community. They need to stand and support these Christians, not only as Christians, but also as human beings, as the citizens of one of the oldest civilizations in the entire world. 
 
What is the current status of Iraqi Christians? How severe is the persecution they face?
I am talking to you while the church in Iraq is celebrating three days of prayer and fasting. They were called to spend three days of the fasting of Baoutha, which means “the cry” or “the cry for help” in the Chaldean rite.
 
In the north of Iraq, churches, holy sites, and Christian artifacts have been demolished by ISIS. For the first time in nearly 2,000 years, there are no Christians left inside the city of Mosul. Some of them went to Kurdistan, others went to Baghdad. I believe the Chaldean voice, the Christian Iraqi voices, should be carried as a cry not for the Christians but as a cry for peace for all.
 
The Christian voice and the Christian identity is not only being tortured—it’s being demolished. More than 120,000 Christians have been forced from their homes in Iraq over the last year. What we see here in Jordan is a manifestation of the daily pain that the church is having, and we need to move and to move fast, to work with superpowers, with the United States, with Europe, with the United Nations Security Council.
 
I believe we need to reach out not only to the Catholics but to all the people of goodwill. This refugee problem is not only about solving the problems of food and shelter. 
 
It is also about the dignity of these people. They have been victimized for no reason other than that they are Christians. And I’m not saying they are the only victims. Many other minorities, such as Yazidis, were tortured, killed, and raped by extremists.
 
This cannot continue. We should not simply watch this behavior and respond only with condemnation. We need to do something to save the lives and the good in this region.
 
Since the United States’ invasion of Iraq in 2003, we have watched Iraq go through a time of bloodshed and killing. And because so many Iraqi Christians have faced recent persecution by extremists, I think the Christian churches must raise their voices not only to protect Christians but also to work and to show their support for the human dignity of all.
 
I called upon Christians when I spoke at a gathering of 1,200 participants in Washington. I asked for the support of our Christian brothers and sisters of the United States and of Europe to show more solidarity than just their support in the media, on TV, and in newspapers. 
 
We need to see more Christians coming to this region, showing this support, and to shake and reshake the conscience of the people of the region. The world cannot continue to be silent or watch from afar. 
 
What does the loss of these Christian communities mean to Muslims in the region?
I always say, “How could Muslims talk about a tolerant Islam, a moderate Islam, when they do not protect and preserve the existence and the presence of their Christian brothers and sisters?” Christians should be given the freedom to be witnesses of Jesus Christ. 
 
The Quran mentions a mandatory respect for Christians and Jews. No one in the world is going to believe Muslims are living out their faith if they don’t reflect such respect for their immediate neighbors, local citizens who have lived here long before Islam began. How can Muslims talk about their faith if they don’t show this faith in action? We need to show within the Iraqi society that Christians are not only an integral part, but also that Christians have always been an added value to the society. 
 
This diversity within the society is the best practice for Muslims. It allows them to experience this kind of dualistic nature within the society. If we look at other societies where Muslims are the majority or the societies where they have fewer Muslims, you see there is extremism. Adding minorities does not only serve the existence of this minority, but it also teaches and reminds the majority that they have to live with these minorities and have to recognize dignity and show respect for them.
 
I say this as a member of a minority in Jordan. In some parts of Jordan, where you see villages that don’t have Christians sharing in the life of the society, people are more reluctant to deal with non-Muslims. It is as important for Iraq to protect the non-Muslim community as it is to protect the Muslim community in order to preserve diversity and peace.
 
What can American Catholics and Christians do to help the situation? 
Christians in this region need to hear a louder voice of support and solidarity. Many of them, especially the Iraqis, feel they are left out. We have to stop these very unjust aggressions and killings, and the international community needs to realize this and speak up.
 
There are powerful nations that can help to accomplish this. We need a stronger will on the part of the international community from Christians, from Catholics, and from Westerners.
 
Our Christian brothers and sisters are showing solidarity and support. We need to push now and exert enough pressure in order to bring these refugees back to their homeland. We owe it to them to offer support so they can get back to their homes. They cannot continue living as refugees. This—to furnish them with their basic rights and not to be driven out of their own homes—is a very Catholic and a very Christian duty.
 
Now, some of them believe that they cannot go back to Iraq because it’s not safe. Many of them are trying to leave Iraq forever, and they say this openly. This is a very big loss for the Christian witness in this region. These Christians don’t have anything. They have no money. They don’t have their own documentation. They don’t have their papers. Many of them are losing hope.
 
That’s why we need this region to hear a loud voice on the part of our brothers and sisters, the Catholic Church in the United States, and other Christians. We need to see this solidarity in order to give refugees hope in this region.
 
We need this kind of hope. We need it. How can people live without hope
- See more at: http://www.uscatholic.org/articles/201512/catholics-and-muslims-common-cause-30488?utm_source=December+12%2C+2015&utm_campaign=Dec+12%2C+2015&utm_medium=email#sthash.WkRwYXTl.dpuf

Have yourself a defiant little Christmas




In those long ago days of Christmas innocence when it always snowed gently in a starry and windless night, my parents would hustle my sisters and me into the back seat of the car, and we would drive slowly, snow crunching under the frozen tires, into the neighborhoods of the rich to see the lights.
The lights were the decorations that people put up on the outside of their houses and winter lawns. Multicolored lights would be strung over an entire house, etching door frames and windows, wrapped round into wreaths and bows. In the frozen front yard there were statues as large as small children. They were usually a mix of the “Night Before Christmas” and the “Crib”—reindeer and wise men, sleighs and shepherds, elves and Mary, angels and carolers, Santa Claus and Baby Jesus. Occasionally the stiff, on-guard soldiers from the “Nutcracker Suite” would make an appearance. All were lit up so that night passengers in slow moving cars could gawk through frosted windows and say, “Look at that one!”
But it was not these elaborate scenes that first brought the truth of Christmas home to me. It was my home, seen in a new way.
Light in the midst of darkness
One Christmas when we returned from our trip to see the lights, I pushed out the back seat, straightened up, and saw our house. We lived in a two flat. My grandparents lived on the first floor, and since they usually went to bed around 9 (a custom I have recently begun to envy), their flat was dark. Our flat on the second floor was also dark—except for the Christmas tree.
The tree was strung with lights, and their soft glow could be seen through the upper window. The outer darkness was all around, yet the tree shone in the darkness. There was no razzle-dazzle, no blinking on and off, no glitz—just a steady shining; a simple juxtaposition of light and darkness. Its beauty drew me.
I ran up the stairs. My parents had already unlocked the door and turned on the house lights. I sat in a chair and stayed with the tree. The attraction of the tree continued for a while and then began to recede. Soon the practical took over. I noticed some tinsel that needed to be smoothed and rehung. As I tinkered with it, whatever was left of the tree’s radiance dimmed, and then, abruptly, the revelation ceased. Just a pine tree shedding needles on the rug.
It was only when I was older that I knew in a murky mental way what my child’s heart had intuited. Christmas tries to point to an inner light, a tree of lights inside the house of our being, and invites people to come close and ponder its beauty. We notice this light because it is contrasted with an outer darkness. And it defies the darkness, refusing to allow the outer world to dictate the terms of existence. In theological language, people have an inner reality that transcends the outer world and it is capable of shining forth even in the darkest of situations. “In him was life and the life was the light of people. The light shines in the darkness and the darkness has not overcome it” (John 1:4–5).
Of course, our awareness of this truth is fleeting. We return to ordinary consciousness. We smooth the tinsel and vacuum the needles.
Greenness in the midst of barrenness
The Cherokees have a short creation story that encourages the same Christmas insight. The story is “Why Some Trees Are Evergreen.”
When the plants and trees were first made, the Great Mystery gave a gift to each species. But first he set up a contest to determine which gift would be most useful to whom.
“I want you to stay awake and keep watch over the earth for seven nights,” he told them.
The young trees and plants were so excited to be trusted with such an important job that the first night they did not find it difficult to stay awake. However, the second night was not so easy, and just before dawn a few fell asleep. On the third night the trees and plants whispered among themselves in the wind trying to keep from dropping off, but it was too much work for some of them. Even more fell asleep on the fourth night.
By the time the seventh night came, the only trees and plants still awake were the cedar, the pine, the spruce, the fir, the holly, and the laurel.
“What wonderful endurance you have,” exclaimed the Great Mystery. “You shall be given the gift of remaining green forever. You will be the guardians of the forest. Even in the seeming dead of winter, your brother and sister creatures will find life protected in your branches.”
Ever since then all the other trees and plants lose their leaves and sleep all winter while the evergreens stay awake.
This tale does not use the symbols of light and darkness. It talks about greenness in the midst of barrenness and associates this greenness with the ability to stay awake. “Staying awake” is standard code in spiritual literature. It means remaining aware of our life-giving connection to divine reality, even when inner and outer forces militate against it. Just as the light in the darkness reminds us of this truth, so does the green-leafed tree in the leafless forest.
Love in the midst of rejection
The major Christian symbols of Christmas also use contrast to emphasize the invulnerability of our inner transcendent relationship to God. “And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in swaddling clothes and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them at the inn” (Luke 2:7). In one densely symbolic sentence, Saint Luke brings out the contrast of love in the midst of rejection. Jesus is wrapped in swaddling clothes—a symbol that he is a loved child. He is laid in a manger, a feeding trough—a symbol that he is meant to be food for the world. These two symbols point to the reality of self-giving love, the essence of God, and the identity and mission of all those connected to God.
Yet this love is surrounded by rejection—there is no room for him at the inn. This exclusion at his birth is a harbinger of his exclusion by the religious and political elite of his time. He will meet with violent opposition and eventually be put to death. Yet, as the whole gospel testifies, this rejection will not undercut the truth of who he is. He is the beloved Son of God on a mission of communicating divine life to people. This truth is seen most clearly in the premier moment of violent rejection—his death on the cross. These future events are hinted at in the interconnected symbols of swaddling clothes, manger, and no room at the inn. These symbols capture the truth of a loved child in a world of rejection.
A defiant Christmas
The truth of Christmas emerges in imaginative contrasts. Perhaps the best way to view these contrasts is in terms of inner and outer realities. No matter how severe the outer world is—darkness, barrenness, rejection—it cannot snuff out the light, wither the greenness, or destroy the love. Although we do not always reflect on it, there is an edge to Christmas, an in-your-face attitude. Author G. K. Chesterton put it simply and well, “A religion that defies the world should have a feast that defies the weather.”
If I ever return to the custom of sending Christmas cards, the cover will be a picture of a light shining in the darkness or an evergreen in the midst of a barren forest or a laughing child in a ramshackle stable. Inside, the greeting will be straightforward, “Have a defiant Christmas.”
Of course, I really do not want people to have a defiant Christmas. I want them to have a harmonious Christmas. I want the inner and outer world to be in sync. Light inside and out, greenness inside and out, love inside and out. In other words, I wish people the full peace of Christmas—good enough health, good enough finances, good enough relationships, and a good enough stable, nonviolent society and world. As the lapel button calling for the Second Coming from the ’60s put it, “Parousia Now!” Idealistic as it is, that’s what I want.
But that is not what we always get. Christmas arrives to find our health precarious, our careers, jobs, or vocations under stress, our finances dipping badly, our relationships in need of repair, and our society and world slightly insane. How can we celebrate Christmas in situations like these? Isn’t the only realistic response anxiety and gloom?
When the outer world is darkness, barrenness, and rejection, Christmas is a lesson in bringing forth and responding to the inner world of light, greenness, and love. Spiritual teachers think that since this inner world is rooted in a transcendent love, it is more powerful than all the attacks that emerge out of both our finitude and sinfulness. “I have said this that you might have peace in me. In the world you have tribulations, but cheer up, I have overcome the world” (John 16:33). Christmas cheer, when it is modeled on this passage from Saint John, engenders in us a gentle defiance to the tribulations of the world. Gentle defiance is not on the standard list of Christian virtues, but it is the Christmas gift that we all need to unwrap at one December or another.
How do we open this gift of inner light, greenness, and love? How do we get in touch with it? How do we allow it to flow into our lives?
There are some clues in the characters that Christians meditate on in the Advent-Christmas season. Gabriel, Mary, and John the Baptist give hints on how to have a defiant Christmas.
The clue of Gabriel
There is no shortage of angels in the infancy narratives of Matthew and Luke. In Matthew’s story they appear in dreams and give crucial advice to Joseph and the Magi. Luke has angels announce the Good News of the birth of Christ to the shepherds. But the prominent angel who appears to both Zachary and Mary is Gabriel (whose name means the “might of God”). Gabriel’s message is complex and different for both Zachary and Mary, but he has a similar piece of advice for both of them: “Do not be afraid.” (A command that spurred author Madeleine L’Engle to comment, “It gives you some idea of what he looked like.”)
It also gives us some idea of how humans relate to the deeper spaces in them where angels visit. We know we have fears. We fear the loss of health, work, relationships, finances, and so on. However, we may not be aware that we are afraid of the transcendent love that grounds our true selves. The words of Gabriel that trigger Mary’s fear are, “Hail, O highly favored one. The Lord is with you” (Luke 1:28). It is not the fearsome visage of the angel that makes Mary afraid. It is his greeting, his uncovering of the loved self that is on a mission from God. But why should this cause fear?
We are used to identifying ourselves in more modest ways—by our genes, job, roles, psychic makeup, and relationships. “I am the daughter of Ralph and Anna, and I work in health care and am dating Frank. I’m shy but this year I am going to become more assertive.” Everyone is able to draw a similar, no-nonsense portrait of themselves. However, the spiritual identity has been left out of this ego sketch. This spiritual identity is of a different caliber, and its assessment is far from moderate. It is the immoderation that makes us afraid.
We are highly favored ones on a mission from God. No matter how we protest or place obstacles in the path of what God wants (and we will), the angel will out argue us and get us on our way. God’s evaluation overcomes our resistance. Quite simply, divine love is not put off by our allegiance to partial and negative aspects of our personalities and situations. It seems that God thinks that baptism works. We are children of divine love as well as products of biological evolution and cultural alienation. So the angel chooses to address this baptismal identity that we seldom take seriously. This greeting drives us well beyond our comfort zone. Naturally we are afraid.
But how do we become unafraid? Only over long years and after much meditation.
But there is one realization that may help. When we hear Gabriel’s greeting of love and mission, we may think he is saluting the ego, the “me” I look at when I look at myself—the strange mix of boastings, rationalizations, and repressed inadequacies. How can we believe this is “O highly favored one” when it is so obviously in need of redemption? The real address should be, “Hail, O screwed up one!” Gabriel has made a mistake and knocked on the wrong door.
Gabriel has knocked on the right door, but he is talking to someone we seldom identify with. He is addressing our deeper selves—not the me we look at but the looker; not the me that is known but the me that knows. This deeper self coexists with the ego and relates to its powers, imperfections, and alienations and continually shapes the ego as its vehicle of expression in the world. And it is this self that Gabriel wants to awaken, for it is this self that is grounded in divine love and is the servant of divine intentions. Faced with Gabriel’s proclamation of love and mission, do not protest, “You do not know me.” Take the angel seriously and say, “I do not know myself.” The clue of Gabriel is to let go of our fear and entertain the possibility that we may be more and better than we know.
The clue of Mary
At first glance there is an interesting inconsistency in Luke’s infancy narrative. When Gabriel appears to Zachary and tells him that he is soon to be a father, Zachary responds, “How shall I know this? For I am an old man and my wife is advanced in years” (Luke 1:18). Gabriel is not happy with this and reminds Zachary who he is talking to. “I am Gabriel who stands in the presence of God. I was sent to speak to you and bring you this good news” (Luke 1:19). (A free paraphrase would be: “Let’s get things straight. I represent the power of God, and I’m on a mission to tell you what God is doing. And your only reaction is to doubt if it can happen?”) Zachary is then silenced until the birth he did not think could happen has come about.
When Gabriel tells Mary she is to become the mother of the Son of the Most High, she says something very similar to Zachary, “How can this be, since I know not man?” (Luke 1:34). Is she silenced for this questioning? No way. She is given an explanation (a mystical explanation, but still an explanation), “The Holy Spirit will come upon you and the power of the Most High will overshadow you” (Luke 1:35). Both Zachary and Mary have questions about the possibility of what the angel has predicted. How is it that Zachary is silenced and Mary is given an explanation?
But a closer look at the conversation between Mary and Gabriel reveals that Mary’s question is her second response to the angel’s Good News. Her first response is to be troubled and to consider what the greeting meant. Mary is a ponderer of what she does not immediately understand. Zachary’s doubt effectively dismisses the angel’s message; Mary entertains his troublesome words. By the time she asks her question, it is not to doubt the message but to figure out what she must do to cooperate with the message.
Saint Luke stresses Mary’s pondering. When the shepherds make known what the angel told them and the child they found, “all who heard it were amazed” (Luke 2:18). But not Mary. “She kept all these things, pondering them in her heart” (Luke 2:19). After the episode of losing and finding the boy Jesus in the Temple, Saint Luke tells us, “His mother kept all these things in her heart” (Luke 2:51). Later in the gospel we are told that the good soil that yields a hundredfold are those “who, hearing the word, hold it fast in an honest and good heart, and bring forth fruit in patience” (Luke 8:15). Mary lives between the dismissal of Zachary and the amazement of the crowds. She ponders, and that is the clue she gives us to the mystery of Christmas.
But what are we to ponder? Exactly what Mary pondered—the people and events that are near. Everyone has his or her own cast of characters—parents, spouses, children, relatives, friends, neighbors, acquaintances, strangers. Everyone is surrounded and inundated by sights, smells, sounds, touches, and tastes. This overstimulation often becomes too much for people. They yearn for the dull days of January.
The trick is to learn to ponder in the midst of the plenitude. When we receive the richness and variety of Christmas into an open heart, a revelation comes about. We begin to sense the spirit that suffuses the flesh. Everything becomes sacrament—the visibility of an invisible grace. The original Christmas was about spirit becoming flesh—“God becoming human.” Every Christmas since then is about cherishing flesh until the shy spirit emerges. When the spirit-grounding of life shines through its surface, we know that creation and its Creator are bound together in love. We know all that passes in this world of time is held everlastingly in this Eternal Now. We know that Mary pondered to penetrate the depth of reality. And if we follow her clue, we will know why she sang, “My soul magnifies the Lord; my spirit rejoices in God my savior” (Luke 1:46–47).
The clue of John the Baptist
John the Baptist lived in the desert, wore rough clothing, and ate locusts. These are certainly symbols, but even so, this man is no wimp. He is a denouncer of kings, a sayer of hard words, a believer in judgment, a preacher of repentance. It has been joked that even on the platter his head was shouting a prophetic tirade. In most people John inspires respect and fear. Yet I find him a poignant character, and it is this poignancy that is his clue.
John waited for one to come. The one he waited for had an ax in his hand and would chop down the tree that bore no fruit. He had a winnowing fan in his hand, and he would separate the chaff and the wheat. He was the “wrath to come.” The only hope of people was to repent and, possibly, be spared.
But Jesus arrived, and he was not exactly what John had in mind. So from prison John sent his disciples with his own pressing question, “Are you the one who is to come or should we look for another?” (Luke 7:19). Jesus answers empirically, telling the disciples to tell John what they see and hear. “The blind see, cripples walk, lepers are cured, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the poor hear the good news” (Luke 7:22). These are not John’s favorite images of judgment and division but are images of transformation, of reclaiming all that is broken and alienated. That is why Jesus’ last line to John’s disciples is, “Blessed is the one who is not scandalized in me” (Luke 7:23). The John of judgment may be scandalized by the Jesus of transformation.
We are not told explicitly whether John was scandalized by Jesus. But we might surmise that a different dynamic took place. On one level John’s expectations were not met, but on another level they were fulfilled and surpassed. In spiritual teaching there is a distinction between desire and hope. Desire is the projection of what we want in the future. Hope is the arrival of something we did not expect, but once it comes, we recognize that it was always the deepest yearning of our hearts. Could that be what happened to John the Baptist?
What is the deepest yearning of John’s heart and, in fact, all our hearts? I suspect it is for an infusion of spirit, to be united with the animating spirit of the world. We think this spirit will come in a certain form: We identify it with a certain shape. We know what we want, and, if Christmas is to be a success, we had better get it. Yet if we stay stuck on our desires, we just may miss our hope. What we think we need is always something specific—a person has to show up and say exactly what we want to hear, an object has to be obtained, a situation has to work out as we have imagined it. Our mind clings to these desires and in the process blinds us to other possibilities.
John the Baptist waited for a man with an ax. What arrived was a seed scatterer. He waited for someone with a winnowing fan, and along came a bridegroom breaking bread. John thought the spirit would take the form of judgment. Instead, judgment became the prelude to healing, and the fullness of spirit was shown in the resurrection of all things mangled and broken. John’s greatness and his clue is that he was able to let go of the forms he desired and discern the spirit in forms he never dreamed of. If we demand the spirit arrive in the ways we expect, we may go unvisited this Christmas. But if we refuse to be scandalized by the stubbornness of the spirit to blow where it will, it may arrive in our lives in what, at first glance, will surely be a disguise. But, upon pondering, it will be our heart’s hope and our souls will be awakened. Ask John the Baptist.
The path to defiance
The Christmas season is upon us. Is everything perfect? If so, the message is light, greenness, and love. If not, the message will have to be light in the midst of darkness, greenness in the midst of barrenness, love in the midst of rejection. This is the gentle defiance of the spirit.
The way to this spirit is both arduous and simple. We have to move beyond the comfortable reduction that we are merely genetic and social products and recognize we are also children of God. We have to ponder the surface of life until its spiritual depth is manifested and open to spirit in whatever form it takes—for it will often take a form we do not suspect. These general strategies, culled from the infancy narratives of the birth of Jesus Christ, will awaken the gentle spirit in us, a spirit that defies the world.
Perhaps the greeting card that symbolizes a defiant Christmas has already been written. Fra Giovanni put it this way:
I salute you!
There is nothing I can give you which you have not; but there is much, that, while I cannot give, you can take.
No heaven can come to us unless our hearts find rest in it today. Take Heaven.
No peace lies in the future which is not hidden in this present instant. Take Peace.
The gloom of the world is but a shadow; behind it, yet within our reach is joy. Take Joy.
And so at this Christmastime, I greet you with the prayer that for you, now and forever, the day breaks and the shadows flee away.
- See more at: http://www.uscatholic.org/church/saints-feasts-and-seasons/2008/11/have-yourself-a-defiant-christmas?utm_source=December+12%2C+2015&utm_campaign=Dec+12%2C+2015&utm_medium=email#sthash.YRS8siXY.dpuf